S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

1st 2.5L Inlinepro Stroker Kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #111  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by honda9krpm,Nov 1 2004, 08:34 PM
Do you think that the power loss is due to the inbuilt knock control on the OEM ecu?
I haven't experienced anything like that. If lowering VTEC would cause the knock sensor to give a false alert, it would have negative effects well into the RPM range. I lowered VTEC to 5500 RPMs with very good results using my "piggy back".
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:41 PM
  #112  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

[QUOTE=double11,Nov 1 2004, 09:01 PM] Possibly, most of my experience is with stand alone (aem) and not piggybacks.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #113  
double11's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

most of the work I have done on S2k's has been mechanical & manitnance. I have not tuned an s2k on an ems.

I'm trying to source the plugs and pins to make a harness, because the AEM case won't fit in the stock ecu location.


does the vafc allow you to trim the voltage vs. knock ..

an AEM example on Ski
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...pic=182861&hl=



To stay on topic, those are decent numbers from that set-up, I would expect more on a stand alone, and all of the dyno pictures that I posted were stock vs. ems; no other mods, as far as I know.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #114  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

You can get a pre-made a extension harness from http://www.vtecfrog.com/. That's what I used.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:47 PM
  #115  
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Nov 2 2004, 01:08 PM
I haven't experienced anything like that. If lowering VTEC would cause the knock sensor to give a false alert, it would have negative effects well into the RPM range. I lowered VTEC to 5500 RPMs with very good results using my "piggy back".
I had similar results too gernby.
However I lost power if I lower vtec any further. It will be interesting to see how low a standalone computer can lower the vtec engagement point.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 04:54 AM
  #116  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by double11,Nov 1 2004, 11:24 PM
does the vafc allow you to trim the voltage vs. knock ..
The V-AFC I does not have any features pertaining to a knock sensor. However, the V-AFC II does have an input from the knock sensor(s). I doubt it has any trim or calibration features. I haven't even seen a V-AFC II, so I'm just going by the feature list on their web site.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 08:10 AM
  #117  
buzilanga's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Willemstad
Default

No dyno sheets of the car yet?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 07:43 PM
  #118  
Venomous S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 4
From: Barkhamsted
Default

Originally Posted by kitwetzler,Oct 25 2004, 03:16 PM
Yes I did.

14.4:1 is way too lean under power. closed loop doesn't allow you to run richer than that.

not to mention that short term fuel trims become long term fuel trims which get applied to open loop! that's how you "tune away" your changes.
can you explain this better?

Lets say for example that w/ the VAFC I add more fuel at idle so it becomes richer than 14.4 at idle. (this is for argument sake only). What will this do to my WOT fuel map settings?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 04:44 AM
  #119  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Venomous S,Nov 3 2004, 11:43 PM
can you explain this better?

Lets say for example that w/ the VAFC I add more fuel at idle so it becomes richer than 14.4 at idle. (this is for argument sake only). What will this do to my WOT fuel map settings?
V-AFCs can only remove fuel by reducing the MAP voltage by some percentage. You can't really "add" fuel, since that would require increasing the MAP voltage which will look like boost. If the ECU sees a positive pressure in the manifold, it will freak out.

The other issue is that the V-AFC needs to be "invisible" to the ECU when it is in closed loop. Otherwise, the ECU will tune the V-AFC out.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:58 AM
  #120  
Venomous S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 4
From: Barkhamsted
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Nov 4 2004, 08:44 AM
V-AFCs can only remove fuel by reducing the MAP voltage by some percentage. You can't really "add" fuel, since that would require increasing the MAP voltage which will look like boost. If the ECU sees a positive pressure in the manifold, it will freak out.

The other issue is that the V-AFC needs to be "invisible" to the ECU when it is in closed loop. Otherwise, the ECU will tune the V-AFC out.
When you connect the VAFC you connect it so the ECU doesnt see positive pressure. I got that and naturally thats how i connected mine, so when you are adding fuel this is increasing map voltage so the ECU freaks out? I am adding fuel from 5,000RPM's onwards. How is this affecting the ECU though in open loop?

In closed loop the ECU will take over any adjustments done via the VAFC, understand that, but if I changed any settings at idle for argument sake, will this still affect my WOT settings? im still not clear...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 AM.