1st 2.5L Inlinepro Stroker Kit
Originally Posted by honda9krpm,Nov 1 2004, 08:34 PM
Do you think that the power loss is due to the inbuilt knock control on the OEM ecu?
most of the work I have done on S2k's has been mechanical & manitnance. I have not tuned an s2k on an ems.
I'm trying to source the plugs and pins to make a harness, because the AEM case won't fit in the stock ecu location.
does the vafc allow you to trim the voltage vs. knock ..
an AEM example on Ski
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...pic=182861&hl=
To stay on topic, those are decent numbers from that set-up, I would expect more on a stand alone, and all of the dyno pictures that I posted were stock vs. ems; no other mods, as far as I know.
I'm trying to source the plugs and pins to make a harness, because the AEM case won't fit in the stock ecu location.
does the vafc allow you to trim the voltage vs. knock ..
an AEM example on Ski
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...pic=182861&hl=
To stay on topic, those are decent numbers from that set-up, I would expect more on a stand alone, and all of the dyno pictures that I posted were stock vs. ems; no other mods, as far as I know.
Originally Posted by gernby,Nov 2 2004, 01:08 PM
I haven't experienced anything like that. If lowering VTEC would cause the knock sensor to give a false alert, it would have negative effects well into the RPM range. I lowered VTEC to 5500 RPMs with very good results using my "piggy back".
However I lost power if I lower vtec any further. It will be interesting to see how low a standalone computer can lower the vtec engagement point.
Originally Posted by double11,Nov 1 2004, 11:24 PM
does the vafc allow you to trim the voltage vs. knock ..
Originally Posted by kitwetzler,Oct 25 2004, 03:16 PM
Yes I did.
14.4:1 is way too lean under power. closed loop doesn't allow you to run richer than that.
not to mention that short term fuel trims become long term fuel trims which get applied to open loop! that's how you "tune away" your changes.
14.4:1 is way too lean under power. closed loop doesn't allow you to run richer than that.
not to mention that short term fuel trims become long term fuel trims which get applied to open loop! that's how you "tune away" your changes.
Lets say for example that w/ the VAFC I add more fuel at idle so it becomes richer than 14.4 at idle. (this is for argument sake only). What will this do to my WOT fuel map settings?
Originally Posted by Venomous S,Nov 3 2004, 11:43 PM
can you explain this better?
Lets say for example that w/ the VAFC I add more fuel at idle so it becomes richer than 14.4 at idle. (this is for argument sake only). What will this do to my WOT fuel map settings?
Lets say for example that w/ the VAFC I add more fuel at idle so it becomes richer than 14.4 at idle. (this is for argument sake only). What will this do to my WOT fuel map settings?
The other issue is that the V-AFC needs to be "invisible" to the ECU when it is in closed loop. Otherwise, the ECU will tune the V-AFC out.
Originally Posted by gernby,Nov 4 2004, 08:44 AM
V-AFCs can only remove fuel by reducing the MAP voltage by some percentage. You can't really "add" fuel, since that would require increasing the MAP voltage which will look like boost. If the ECU sees a positive pressure in the manifold, it will freak out.
The other issue is that the V-AFC needs to be "invisible" to the ECU when it is in closed loop. Otherwise, the ECU will tune the V-AFC out.
The other issue is that the V-AFC needs to be "invisible" to the ECU when it is in closed loop. Otherwise, the ECU will tune the V-AFC out.
In closed loop the ECU will take over any adjustments done via the VAFC, understand that, but if I changed any settings at idle for argument sake, will this still affect my WOT settings? im still not clear...








