Difference between a dynojet and mustang Dyno
[QUOTE]Originally posted by schwett
[B]
it may be obvious, but it's entirely relevant to this thread. the dynojet is a more accurate representation of the real-world performance of the vehicle. the dynapack is a more accurate representation of the power of the engine itself. 40 pounds of wheel may be a 'variable' but it is a real factor in the performance of the vehicle.
[B]
it may be obvious, but it's entirely relevant to this thread. the dynojet is a more accurate representation of the real-world performance of the vehicle. the dynapack is a more accurate representation of the power of the engine itself. 40 pounds of wheel may be a 'variable' but it is a real factor in the performance of the vehicle.
Lighter parts I believe definitely would show a difference in power. Less rotational mass.
On a roller dyno, I also believe that larger ratio, heavier wheels will make a difference too.
On a roller dyno, I also believe that larger ratio, heavier wheels will make a difference too.
Originally posted by beroznikmal
I have read that it is typical to see a 20% loss in HP from engine to wheel....I suspect that using lighter fly wheel, drive shaft and things like that will decrease this loss... Has anyone tried it?
Also does the weight of my wheel set up make a diff on a mustang dyno... Example, If my base runs were done using OEM wheel and I then replace the OEM with some heavy ass 18" wheels.....
Thanks
Beroz
I have read that it is typical to see a 20% loss in HP from engine to wheel....I suspect that using lighter fly wheel, drive shaft and things like that will decrease this loss... Has anyone tried it?
Also does the weight of my wheel set up make a diff on a mustang dyno... Example, If my base runs were done using OEM wheel and I then replace the OEM with some heavy ass 18" wheels.....
Thanks
Beroz
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1036AP2
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
14
Jun 19, 2006 04:07 PM



