S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

The Computer Corner

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 10:14 AM
  #141  
geek's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Suisun City, California
Default

Go to http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/s...re/default.mspx
That is the Microsoft Anti Spyware Beta site. Downloading and using the Beta is free and it seems to work pretty good.

jerry
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #142  
JonasM's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,211
Likes: 135
From: Euclid, OH
Default



Microsoft's AntiSpyware was recommended to me by our Network Admin. He told me, and I've found it to be true, that their version will find stuff that the others don't. It's the only version that I know of that has realtime protection (i.e. it will block spyware before it gets onto your system. Last time I used AdAware, it requires me to run it periodically.

The current Beta version expires July 31st. I don't know whether they will charge for the real thing or not.

JonasM
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #143  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,790
Likes: 8,296
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

Originally Posted by JonasM,Jun 5 2005, 03:45 PM


Microsoft's AntiSpyware was recommended to me by our Network Admin. He told me, and I've found it to be true, that their version will find stuff that the others don't. It's the only version that I know of that has realtime protection (i.e. it will block spyware before it gets onto your system. Last time I used AdAware, it requires me to run it periodically.

The current Beta version expires July 31st. I don't know whether they will charge for the real thing or not.

JonasM
That sounds like a good program. It does require you have Windows 2000 or newer. Since I have Windows 98 (see I said earlier I was a non-geek), I quess I will stick with Ad-Aware. It does require that you initiate the search.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #144  
gswetsky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: Under a Shady Palm
Default

Don't compare Microsoft's product with Ad Aware. In preparation to writing an article for a regional computer mag, I ran some tests using both products.

For the most part, each of these products will find spy ware and in my tests neither will find the spyware the other one does. I try to NOT have more than one program doing a particular task on my computers, however in the case of spyware programs, it seems the more, the merrier. Matter of fact, after comparing the two programs on my computer and allowing each to clean its particular spyware, I ran a third product from Zone Labs and guess what? More spyware detected!

So what do I run on the "big machine"? Ad Aware, Microsoft Anti-Spyware and Registry First Aid plus Zone Alarm Suite for firewall, virus detection and e-mail protection. And guess what? There's still some crap on here somewhere that's causing problems. <sigh> it never ends.......



Gerry
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #145  
JonasM's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,211
Likes: 135
From: Euclid, OH
Default

Originally Posted by gswetsky,Jun 5 2005, 10:16 PM
Don't compare Microsoft's product with Ad Aware. In preparation to writing an article for a regional computer mag, I ran some tests using both products.

For the most part, each of these products will find spy ware and in my tests neither will find the spyware the other one does. I try to NOT have more than one program doing a particular task on my computers, however in the case of spyware programs, it seems the more, the merrier. Matter of fact, after comparing the two programs on my computer and allowing each to clean its particular spyware, I ran a third product from Zone Labs and guess what? More spyware detected!

So what do I run on the "big machine"? Ad Aware, Microsoft Anti-Spyware and Registry First Aid plus Zone Alarm Suite for firewall, virus detection and e-mail protection. And guess what? There's still some crap on here somewhere that's causing problems. <sigh> it never ends.......



Gerry
I do run AdAware occasionally, too, but so far it hasn't found anything. But then, I practice safe hex (be very paranoid about any site I visit).

JonasM
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 06:57 AM
  #146  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by charlie,Jun 5 2005, 07:20 AM
help getting rid of spyware pronto!!! help
Here you go Charlie this should fix up your ware/malware/adware right away!

http://www.apple.com/switch/



utsflamesuiton:
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 07:41 AM
  #147  
gswetsky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: Under a Shady Palm
Default

Oh PLEASE don't start this!!



Gerry
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 08:08 AM
  #148  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 04:03 AM
  #149  
mns2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,193
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default

You should check out Webroot Spy Sweeper. Real time protection, anti-hijacking, fast sweep time.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 03:49 AM
  #150  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,790
Likes: 8,296
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

GM vs Microsoft

For all of us who feel only the deepest love and affection for the way computers have enhanced our lives, read on. At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated:

"If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:

"If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics" and I just love this part:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.

6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.

7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.

8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 PM.