Site Info Open forum for the discussion of the S2K International site and organization. If you like what we're doing, post it here. If you don't, post it here too. Get answers to site related questions.

Talk over-moderated

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 01:39 PM
  #141  
sam_spider's Avatar
Site Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 50,928
Likes: 3,413
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by arsenal
Just look at the first four pages and ignore the rest
Depends on how you have your settings, it's showing me we're still on page 3.
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 01:43 PM
  #142  
alSpeed2k's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,599
Likes: 79
From: The 604
Default

Wow, this is quite a thread.

It's definitely not an easy job being a moderator; thanks for trying!

Moderators should definitely be able to post in sections in which they moderate. Sometimes the moderator has excellent info on the topics at hand!

I agree with most that some bumped topics should not be closed, especially when the thread contains correct info. Sometimes people have just one question and would rather tag it onto an older thread than start a new thread that might only warrant a single answer. I like to click the "View New Content" button to see what's happening on s2ki, sometimes when I click into a locked thread I see a poster had asked a question to which the mod suggested he/she start an new thread; unfortunately, for whatever reason, sometimes they don't and so now they don't get they get the answer they are looking for.
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 01:44 PM
  #143  
alSpeed2k's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,599
Likes: 79
From: The 604
Default

Originally Posted by sam_spider
Originally Posted by arsenal' timestamp='1377811563' post='22752512
Just look at the first four pages and ignore the rest
Depends on how you have your settings, it's showing me we're still on page 3.

I'm on page 2!
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 02:35 PM
  #144  
Mocky's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 105,828
Likes: 152
Default

Originally Posted by sam_spider

Depends on how you have your settings, it's showing me we're still on page 3.
Mobile app says we are on Page 10

Old Aug 29, 2013 | 02:54 PM
  #145  
A 2's Avatar
A 2
Former Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 46,399
Likes: 194
From: Albany, UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by Fasting
Originally Posted by Luder94' timestamp='1377808003' post='22752331
I stated my peace/piece with an apology in this thread, and stating again that I regretted my responses now.
I've heard you are a good guy. What you said goes a long way.
I've lost my cool at times too. We're human.

Say, I didn't start this thread to be a bitchfest and an Us vs. Them. I never named names and don't intend to.
I want to talk solutions to issues.
Let's walk it back... ok?
+1 on the bolded section and the rest too
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 02:56 PM
  #146  
A 2's Avatar
A 2
Former Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 46,399
Likes: 194
From: Albany, UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by Mocky
Originally Posted by sam_spider

Depends on how you have your settings, it's showing me we're still on page 3.
Mobile app says we are on Page 10

I'm on Page 3.

But getting (lest we be locked )

I liked Luder's suggested method to go about making change.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 10:17 AM
  #147  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,655
Likes: 171
Default

You know what might be the ideal solution?

3 month rolling average of complaints against moderators. For example I would have filed multiple against the goddest. If her figure hit the 'threshold' during that 3 month period she is put under review, communication is had between her and the admins. If behavior doesn't improve the mod status is removed.

This allows active users to vote on the mods behavior. Giving us a say in how we want to be moderated.

Clearly 1 complaint would be too easy, and 100 too many. The nice thing about this method is it really removes a lot of the 'extra' rules we need to cover. If for example the goddest is to strictly enforcing the TOS, she's going to know about it and fast through this system.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 10:29 AM
  #148  
Mocky's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 105,828
Likes: 152
Default

Feedback suggestion noted. We currently do have an internal process btw.
If you have an issue with a Moderator, there is a report button that is available to all users. When there is a problem the Moderating Team will see it and issue the feedback. We have revoked, even suspended Moderators before due to their actions or their inability to accept their feedback. Much like the "rep" feature, leaving this open as a public view would not be ideal. I'm all for an upgrade (someday) where sellers/vendors feedback "rep" is public, but for people (Mods and Guest/Members as well), the view is private.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 03:01 PM
  #149  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,367
Likes: 428
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

Originally Posted by rob-2
You know what might be the ideal solution?

3 month rolling average of complaints against moderators. For example I would have filed multiple against the goddest. If her figure hit the 'threshold' during that 3 month period she is put under review, communication is had between her and the admins. If behavior doesn't improve the mod status is removed.

This allows active users to vote on the mods behavior. Giving us a say in how we want to be moderated.

Clearly 1 complaint would be too easy, and 100 too many. The nice thing about this method is it really removes a lot of the 'extra' rules we need to cover. If for example the goddest is to strictly enforcing the TOS, she's going to know about it and fast through this system.

As Mocky said, feedback is noted. It's not going to happen that way.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 11:30 PM
  #150  
Bullwings's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,088
Likes: 838
Default

I haven't read through every single post BUT...

As a moderator, you're always a moderator. It's the same as being a police officer in the "real-world". Even when you're not on-duty, you're still a police officer. You now take on a responsibility and thus restrict yourself from certain activities (if you're a good cop that is). how do things play out in real life? Very different from that. Being a police officer is a choice, as is being a moderator. You restrict and moderate other people, but at the same time, you are now bound by a higher set of rules and codes. You don't get to enjoy things the same way that everyone else does - it's the sacrifice that you willfully choose as a moderator/police officer. If you don't like those restrictions, then being a moderator/police officer is not for you. And, going with that analogy, police officers are generally thankless jobs that are hated... Of course there is a fine line.

That being said...

everyone just needs to STFU and go drive

We have an awesome car that was made to be driven and enjoyed. More driving + less posting = fewer moderator problems...

Keep it in check or on the track though... other wise that other "real-life" moderator might tag your ass with a ticket or worse.

I will say that, the forums that i frequent are rather nice. The mods there do a pretty good job - "Racing & Competition" in particular.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 AM.