JDM Tuning Expert advice and discussion on JDM tuning for your S2000.

the Official "NA Tuning" thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 08:04 AM
  #2231  
ack5252's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
Default

A V-AFC II would make a wonderful difference by allowing you to lean out the top end for some more peak power. V-tec could be switched, and you'll probably get some mid-range gains as well.
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #2232  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by ack5252,Oct 26 2006, 09:04 AM
A V-AFC II would make a wonderful difference by allowing you to lean out the top end for some more peak power. V-tec could be switched, and you'll probably get some mid-range gains as well.
vafc is the biggest bang for the buck on our cars.
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #2233  
S2k-Takara's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,427
Likes: 0
From: Natomas, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Oct 26 2006, 10:36 AM
Just get an AEM EMS...no need to screw around.
sounds like alot of money
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #2234  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Oct 26 2006, 11:04 AM
The gains you are talking about with an AEM EMS are midrange gains, not peak. There is no way you will get a 22rwhp peak gain from an EMS. If we are going to make these kind of statements, let's please include where in the powerband the gains are made.
Hey there king hater, see my sig. I got 22 rwhp PEAK, with HUGE gains midrange, but I didn't pay close enough attention to them, since most of that was attributed to lowering VTEC.

I never once stated my gains were midrange....
maybe you're confusing my ITB comments...
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #2235  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Oct 26 2006, 07:04 AM
The gains you are talking about with an AEM EMS are midrange gains, not peak. There is no way you will get a 22rwhp peak gain from an EMS. If we are going to make these kind of statements, let's please include where in the powerband the gains are made.
186WHP before EMS, 208WHP after....... that is peak. he most likey had even better gains in the midrange
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #2236  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by wildcardtrd,Oct 26 2006, 10:21 AM
Hey there king hater, see my sig. I got 22 rwhp PEAK, with HUGE gains midrange, but I didn't pay close enough attention to them, since most of that was attributed to lowering VTEC.

I never once stated my gains were midrange....
maybe you're confusing my ITB comments...
beat me to it!!
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #2237  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

^^^I did If my car could go up against it's old self, it'd be an asswhoopin' not soon forgotten

My entire powerband benefitted greatly from the EMS...dropping VTEC to 5700 opened up about 20 ponies, which it held all the way to redline. I wish the floppy disc worked, I'd love to post the before and after dyno's. This next time I'm going to take pictures of the dyno screen, as well as a floppy, so I'll defenately have something to show you guys.
2nrwerks dyno place doesn't have a printer, (or at least didn't last time I was there), so an electronic copy is going to have to suffice.
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #2238  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Oct 26 2006, 10:44 AM
Apparently you got an S that wasn't very well tuned from the factory...because that is an anomaly.
its pretty normal for AP1's 00-01.....
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #2239  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

Yea, my best guess is that Honda made sure the fuel maps went way rich in the upper rpms as a safety precaution when they first made this car. The maps slowly leaned out over time as Honda gathered more information on longivity, but as for us poor bastards that have the old cars, they're pretty butt slow when you compare them to any newer years. I figure that since swapping out for an '03 ecu is good for about 10 ponies, the AEM gave me another 12 on top of where that should have been, so now you're looking at the average gains, had my car been a little newer

Half of my tune was just getting me to where I should have been in the first place
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #2240  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Oct 26 2006, 12:44 PM
My MY06 only gained 2rwhp peak, but ~20rwhp midrange.
it seems like the MY06+ are tuned much better from the factory.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.