Done with Phase 1 (P90x)
my2ks2k,
I responded with a clear STUDY that showed NO correlation between eating many small meals vs. fewer meals and METABOLIC change. I was responding to the other guy who clearly was just regurgitating what he read elsewhere, saying "smaller fewer meals raises your metabolism." That's BS.
When did I say to skip breakfast? You guys ought to get to class and pay attention. Condoning my decision of 2 meals a day is not saying to skip breakfast. Wow, talk about a logic FAIL. I am an adult, for younger folks who NEED the nutrients, it certainly seems that breakfast is a very good thing. Seeing as how I'm 29, I don't fall into this category. I forget at times that there are still kids in these threads, and yes, if you're a teenager, you probably should eat breakfast.
Me refuting the notion that many smaller meals does not cause your metabolism to rise is not me saying to not eat breakfast. *sigh* Just.. wow.. As I said, if you feel you need breakfast and it helps you, by all means eat it, but it's perfectly logical to think that others fare just fine w/o breakfast. I certainly haven't seen the evidence that you're better off eating a piece of crap than not eating breakfast (I suppose for younger folks however this might be true)..
Btw, that's not my blog.
I responded with a clear STUDY that showed NO correlation between eating many small meals vs. fewer meals and METABOLIC change. I was responding to the other guy who clearly was just regurgitating what he read elsewhere, saying "smaller fewer meals raises your metabolism." That's BS.
When did I say to skip breakfast? You guys ought to get to class and pay attention. Condoning my decision of 2 meals a day is not saying to skip breakfast. Wow, talk about a logic FAIL. I am an adult, for younger folks who NEED the nutrients, it certainly seems that breakfast is a very good thing. Seeing as how I'm 29, I don't fall into this category. I forget at times that there are still kids in these threads, and yes, if you're a teenager, you probably should eat breakfast.
Me refuting the notion that many smaller meals does not cause your metabolism to rise is not me saying to not eat breakfast. *sigh* Just.. wow.. As I said, if you feel you need breakfast and it helps you, by all means eat it, but it's perfectly logical to think that others fare just fine w/o breakfast. I certainly haven't seen the evidence that you're better off eating a piece of crap than not eating breakfast (I suppose for younger folks however this might be true)..

Btw, that's not my blog.
Btw, citing a google search as "evidence" is laughable. That's a measure of popular sentiment, which is often times wrong (in many different things). Like I said, how many Dr's were wrong back in the 80's/90's in regards to the cause of heart disease and the solution? The majority. You just committed a very basic logical fallacy.
In summary, my point is simply that eating breakfast is by no means "necessary" or even beneficial for everyone (which is why I don't eat breakfast).
In summary, my point is simply that eating breakfast is by no means "necessary" or even beneficial for everyone (which is why I don't eat breakfast).
Originally Posted by SlowTeg,Oct 12 2010, 01:35 PM
Btw, citing a google search as "evidence" is laughable. That's a measure of popular sentiment, which is often times wrong (in many different things). Like I said, how many Dr's were wrong back in the 80's/90's in regards to the cause of heart disease and the solution? The majority. You just committed a very basic logical fallacy.
In summary, my point is simply that eating breakfast is by no means "necessary" or even beneficial for everyone (which is why I don't eat breakfast).
In summary, my point is simply that eating breakfast is by no means "necessary" or even beneficial for everyone (which is why I don't eat breakfast).
Originally Posted by SlowTeg,Oct 12 2010, 03:26 PM
When did I say to skip breakfast? You guys ought to get to class and pay attention. Condoning my decision of 2 meals a day is not saying to skip breakfast. Wow, talk about a logic FAIL.

you posted a study, i posted a study. both by MDs. my conclusion is...YMMV.
when i mentioned having "heard that it may be better to eat something bad for you than to not eat anything for breakfast", what i should have said was that i watched a nutritional/exercise special in an exercise science class; a test was run that showed (at least for this test) subjects who ate a (somewhat) fatty meal before exercising burned more calories than those who didn't eat anything.
Originally Posted by SlowTeg,Oct 12 2010, 03:35 PM
Btw, citing a google search as "evidence" is laughable. That's a measure of popular sentiment, which is often times wrong (in many different things). Like I said, how many Dr's were wrong back in the 80's/90's in regards to the cause of heart disease and the solution? The majority. You just committed a very basic logical fallacy.
In summary, my point is simply that eating breakfast is by no means "necessary" or even beneficial for everyone (which is why I don't eat breakfast).
In summary, my point is simply that eating breakfast is by no means "necessary" or even beneficial for everyone (which is why I don't eat breakfast).

Originally Posted by my2ks2k,Oct 12 2010, 11:41 AM
you're right, you didn't say specifically to skip breakfast. my apologies 
you posted a study, i posted a study. both by MDs. my conclusion is...YMMV.

you posted a study, i posted a study. both by MDs. my conclusion is...YMMV.
If I come across as a prick, I apologize..
Either way, good to have a discussion with someone and come to some kind of agreement. Take a look at that blog when you have some time. It's quite fascinating. Like I said, I don't follow it, but there are certainly some very interesting things you can take away from it.Good luck on your p90x routine.. I'm too lazy to do it myself.. lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LordVagabond
Off-topic Talk
8
Aug 13, 2003 10:32 PM







