Originally Posted by no_s2k,Apr 28 2007, 09:52 PM

small turbo=fast spool time

Originally Posted by Will_ChinLee,Apr 29 2007, 02:16 AM

I have to disagree with you on that one. Dynojets uses an inertia sweep/acceleration method of measuring power, so there is no input as far as vehicle weight or load on the car during the dyno. The Dyno Dynamics take the measurements under load, as I previously stated. It is common to many tuners that the Dyno Dynamics dynos are known as the "heartbreakers" as they measure lower however more accurate real world numbers, than a dynojet and much lower than a Dynapack. The Dynapack are probably the "kindest" of all dynos as they usually measure higher, based on the fact which they take the power directly from the hubs. Granted they also can create load, like the Dyno Dynamics, however as stated before usually show higher numbers.
I'm sure if I dynoed on a Dynapack or Dynojet we'd see number much closer to 300whp if not higher.
Though I am no specialist by any means on Dynos, as there is many factors which play key parts in their measurements. The important thing too look at rather than peak numbers is the curves and how it measures up to other cars running on that same dyno.
Thanks.

Originally Posted by BulldogS2,Apr 29 2007, 09:01 AM

for those of you who are experienced with Greddy turbo kits, do you think it will be a hard job to get it up to 9 psi and not have problems? if so, can you guesstimate the potential rwhp?

Originally Posted by ChefJ,Apr 29 2007, 10:56 AM

Does it really matter what it makes on one dyno or the other. It can't compete with inline pro, full race, or lovefab. Period. You may aswell get an OBX manifold from ebay and piece one together, you will get the same numbers or better.