S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Lightweight S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 12, 2002 | 06:19 PM
  #21  
Ballistic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Colts Neck
Default

[QUOTE] i wouldnt go w/ a cf hood just for 5 pounds. id rather diet and lose 5 pounds then fork over $1000 for a new hood just to save weight. just my opinion though.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 09:57 AM
  #22  
Honda Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: sonoma
Default

speakin of nsx perforamnce. i wander if the S will become faster when the v8 nsx comes out...who knows
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 11:42 AM
  #23  
S2K-MONTREAL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Montr
Default

Sounds good but I'm curious to know how the car will handle after these mods; I'm not too sure if it will still be 50-50 balanced.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by spider
[B]Someone on this board has an S2000 weighing in at 2,590 lbs.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 01:12 PM
  #24  
Prolene's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by S2K-MONTREAL
Sounds good but I'm curious to know how the car will handle after these mods; I'm not too sure if it will still be 50-50 balanced.

I don't have the figures in front of me, but with the mods Spider listed and me in the seat, the f/r balance was biased to the front only by a couple of gallons worth of gas or less.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 03:01 PM
  #25  
AzNRocKet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Au coeur de la Belle Province!
Default

And, just my opinion, aluminium or CF hardtop as an accessory and just like the Subaru Impreza Type RA Spec C, make the windows, windshield, any glass parts thinner.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 03:05 PM
  #26  
Insomniak's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Htown-land of smog n' potholes
Default

the side impact beems in each door could be replaced with titanium.. saving about 100lbs a piece.. and keeping the cars balance since reducing the same amount on each side.. and remain streetable and safe.

it would be around 1k for blunt titanium beems from what i've heard.. less cutting and molding less cost.

Someone in the UK did this and posted it several months back doing prep for the track they had to be at a certain weight.. i don't think he replaced the beams w/ anything though.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 04:36 PM
  #27  
jelliotlevy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Hilton Head Island
Default

It's a small point, but every pound saved on aftermarket wheels counts approximately double. When you accelerate a vehicle, you must push the entire weight, including the wheels, up to speed. However, the energy required to push a wheel up to 60 mph is approximately equalled by the energy to get that wheel spinning at the rotational speed corresponding to 60 mph (rotational inertia).
In my old RX-7, there was a practical weight saving by mounting the temporary spare tire on a pint-sized aluminum wheel, and by having a jack made mostly of aluminum. Come to think of it, the 3rd gen RX-7 had 225/50*16 tires, so its temporary spare would probably be suitable for the S2000, and might be found cheaply on a cannibalized RX.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAY'S
S2000 Racing and Competition
39
Jul 28, 2005 07:28 PM
SM00TH976
S2000 Talk
17
Oct 7, 2004 11:59 AM
devilchrist
S2000 Talk
32
Apr 12, 2004 11:58 AM
rn2nvs
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
20
Oct 23, 2003 07:53 AM
Phantom
S2000 Talk
19
Jun 18, 2001 12:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 PM.