JDM Tuning Expert advice and discussion on JDM tuning for your S2000.

the Official "NA Tuning" thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #2871  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by versionJDM,Dec 8 2006, 07:44 AM
you will, look at me.
damn SAE, my uncorrected and DIN numbers are great .
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #2872  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by BlownAP,Dec 8 2006, 08:09 AM
damn SAE, my uncorrected and DIN numbers are great .
Vid of the pull?
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:40 AM
  #2873  
clawhammer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,683
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Is that 216 SAE or uncorrected?
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #2874  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

Originally Posted by BlownAP,Dec 8 2006, 09:22 AM
well guys....

the 70mm dose make more power than the 63mm Headerback I had on my car before, but I was expecting more I guess....... On a side note. the T1r came in without any gaskets, so i had to make due with what I had, the flange at the rear(axleback) has a HUGE leak.... Im going to try and find a gasket that works today at lunch.

Im not sure if that was hurting me or not but the car is RFL right now. and nasty sounding.


here are the numbers

63MM Headerback, T1r 63mm Testpipe+ Spugen Single Ti V2

VS

70MM Headerback T1R 70.


Peak It made 4HP and 2-3-4 HP everywhere else, lost about 2hp at 4200RPMs but it makes up for it everywhere else.

here is the Sheet. Possibly re-dyno this afternoon if I get the flange to seal!



Very nice definitive test!! Thank you!
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #2875  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

Originally Posted by clawhammer,Dec 8 2006, 11:40 AM
Is that 216 SAE or uncorrected?
top right corner: SAE smoothing:0

The smoothing factor is pretty much irrelevant...it does exactly what it sounds like it does...makes a prettier line

The important factor is it's SAE, so those are some damn good numbers!
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:53 AM
  #2876  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

I'll edit the dyno comparo in a little bit...expect it sometime this afternoon.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #2877  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

My uncorrected were 219WHP LMFAO and DIN were 222WHP AHAHAHAH


no vid sorry,

it woundnt be pretty anyways with the leak, I have other vids I can post when I get home !
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #2878  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

^^^The exhaust leak will defenately rob power from you...they tend to cause all sorts of turbulence in the exhaust flow. You want that flow as linear as possible.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 09:21 AM
  #2879  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by wildcardtrd,Dec 8 2006, 09:54 AM
^^^The exhaust leak will defenately rob power from you...they tend to cause all sorts of turbulence in the exhaust flow. You want that flow as linear as possible.
you'll probably get another 2-3 back.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #2880  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

version, I'd link that dyno to your sticky up at the front...that's pretty solid proof that 70mm works better...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 PM.