S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

S2000 STR prep resource

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #1171  
whitt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Germantown TN
Default

You could have the lobe wielded and reground if you have a good local cam grinder. wielded lobes are stronger than stock.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #1172  
TheNick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Default

Anyone else see something wrong with the upper mount on the shocks or is it just me?
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #1173  
glagola1's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by TheNick,Feb 10 2010, 02:01 PM
Anyone else see something wrong with the upper mount on the shocks or is it just me?
let's hope you can close your hood!
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:06 AM
  #1174  
GEARHEAD's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 588
Likes: 7
From: Bellingham
Default

Originally Posted by TheNick,Feb 9 2010, 01:06 PM
Do yourself a favor and do two step shim stacks. One shim stack for low speed - then a spacer - then your smaller stack for mid-high speed damping. DO NOT USE ANY PRELOAD. Try it out and see what happens.


You don't need a whole lot of rebound, but I would try the double digressive piston if I were you - you need SOME low speed rebound and right now you don't have any at all with the linear rebound. When you added more rear rebound - you added a ton of high speed damping that will cause the inside tire to skip over the surface. This can cause some goofy handling characteristics.

Your rebound adjuster only touches the bleed through a jet in the shaft. You can replace the jet to get different low speed characteristics as well. I don't think you can mess with the 8100 canister much - you'll just need to put thicker shims on the compression side.
I agree, a double digressive piston would be a better option. However, I'm curious about your Preload comment. Why not use "ANY PRELOAD"? I'm not intimately familiar with Penske's double digressive piston but if it's like others I've used, it has a lot of low speed damping and perhaps using a preloaded shim stack would be too much. This assumes you were referencing compression and not the linear rebound side.
What about using a preloaded stack on the rebound side to get some digressive behavior?
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:18 AM
  #1175  
TheNick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Default

Bottom of Page 45:

They then use multiple levels of shim stacks with spacers and very low preload. They use thicker shims to get the high speed damping, instead of preloading thinner shims. The shims have a progressive spring rate, if you preload them - they lose the initial soft spring rate and go straight to the harsher rate. When you blow off at the knee of the curve, the shims snap open very quickly. By using thicker shims and low preload - the initial soft spring rate is still preserved and the transition is much smoother.
Works for Moton - why wouldn't it work for Penske too?
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #1176  
glagola1's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

I think Nicks comment about preloading may have to due with the nature of steel spring and how it behaves when preloaded. Something about having an abrupt operation when preloaded which will cause pressure drops on the back side of the valve and erratic behavior on the edge of it's operating realm.

In other words, it will cause a funky transition between high and low speed.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #1177  
angryfist's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default

Fox Racing remote canister?? What did those come off of?
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #1178  
TheNick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Default

A snowmobile or something

I've got 4 more that are longer and meant for a car that someone gave me this past weekend.






Old Feb 10, 2010 | 04:49 PM
  #1179  
alvanderp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by TheNick,Feb 10 2010, 11:01 AM
Anyone else see something wrong with the upper mount on the shocks or is it just me?
I can't tell if the adapter is longer than mine or if there are just more threads on it. Did you try and install the OE topmount yet?

I can't find any pics of mine with the adapter installed on them. The 2nd pic you posted looks more normal to me, maybe it's the scale of the first pic.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #1180  
TheNick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Default

The adapter is quite long. And I haven't tried the OE Top Mount yet. That will be tomorrow.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 PM.