S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

SR20 swap into s2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #111  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by IrishS2k,Dec 27 2006, 03:42 PM
I havent finished reading this thread yet, but that was hilarious. ...

I trust this guys ability, that it will work if he can shoehorn a supra engine into the car and make it work. I think a k20 is a good idea, its not a power house like the supra engine, but the torque and nice redline will be interesting to see. When he does this swap I'd really like to see a race between a reg f20c...Our power band lacks so badly in torque that you never know, this might work out alot better then people think, and i't won't mess with the 50/50 weight distribution due to it being the same weight. I say try it out.
i vounteer to be the first F20 to smash on the k20 s2k.
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 03:56 PM
  #112  
Spartikus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Default

A mildly tuned 13B-REW will put down a lot more power than a stock S2k. Sorry for not specifying the turbo engine. It would be a slight step down in reliability if not built right or if the engine is still all original. I would go all out and buy ceramic seals and a mid-level port job if I ever have to take my 13BT apart. Ceramic seals negate the issue of breaking apex seals(unless you have a HORRIBLE tune) and any other issues would be a result of inadequate cooling. It's a picky engine, but performance-wise it would be great in every way. That being said, I would hold onto the F20 and not do a hack job just in case I wanted/needed to switch back.


+1 for versionJDM being the tester.
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #113  
IrishS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

So what about the acura rdx turbo engine? I saw it mentioned earlier but there was no talk of it. Wasn't there a guy in Miami working on one already?
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #114  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by Spartikus,Dec 27 2006, 04:56 PM
A mildly tuned 13B-REW will put down a lot more power than a stock S2k. Sorry for not specifying the turbo engine. It would be a slight step down in reliability if not built right or if the engine is still all original. I would go all out and buy ceramic seals and a mid-level port job if I ever have to take my 13BT apart. Ceramic seals negate the issue of breaking apex seals(unless you have a HORRIBLE tune) and any other issues would be a result of inadequate cooling. It's a picky engine, but performance-wise it would be great in every way. That being said, I would hold onto the F20 and not do a hack job just in case I wanted/needed to switch back.


+1 for versionJDM being the tester.
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #115  
negcamber's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 5
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Spartikus,Dec 27 2006, 09:45 AM
Also, the numbers that the K puts down can't be directly compared for a swap because the more compact FWD drivetrain saps less power.
I have heard this argument before and went looking for dyno plots to prove it...wasn't able to find any...in fact found that the drive train loss seems pretty similar at around 17%.

Based on the dynos I've seen it looks like:

average dyno for 02-04 RSX-S rated at 200hp appear to be 165whp = ~17% loss

average dyno for 05 RSX-S rated at 210hp appear to be 175whp = ~17% loss

We all know dynos for our car are all over the place...have seen stock dynos as low as 185 and as high as 215. Call it 200whp average. Gives loss of ~17%.
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #116  
Spartikus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by negcamber,Dec 27 2006, 05:39 PM
I have heard this argument before and went looking for dyno plots to prove it...wasn't able to find any...in fact found that the drive train loss seems pretty similar at around 17%.

Based on the dynos I've seen it looks like:

average dyno for 02-04 RSX-S rated at 200hp appear to be 165whp = ~17% loss

average dyno for 05 RSX-S rated at 210hp appear to be 175whp = ~17% loss

We all know dynos for our car are all over the place...have seen stock dynos as low as 185 and as high as 215. Call it 200whp average. Gives loss of ~17%.
Theoretically you are correct, however, the SAE ratings that manufacturers use has changed between those model years and manufacturers themselves have a bit of leeway when it comes to what hp number they give the public. By your theory an Evo IX loses almost nothing to the drivetrain since it dynos 270whp and has a claimed number of 28Xhp at the flywheel.
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #117  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

So does the TL motor spin the same way as our f20C or does it spin the opposite way. I would really dig a high revving V6 with ITBs :SEXY:
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #118  
Wildncrazy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,771
Likes: 2
Default

I still think the best bang for the buck is the original start of the thread, the SR20DET.

Fabulous aftermarket support, an easy unstressed 400 hp, a clear power path that works, and for those obsessed with torque, it has a lot more torque than the FC 20.

Just because another engine is a Honda doesn't make it a good choice.
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 12:02 AM
  #119  
2JZs2000Creator50/50racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IrishS2k,Dec 27 2006, 03:42 PM
I havent finished reading this thread yet, but that was hilarious. ...

I trust this guys ability, that it will work if he can shoehorn a supra engine into the car and make it work. I think a k20 is a good idea, its not a power house like the supra engine, but the torque and nice redline will be interesting to see. When he does this swap I'd really like to see a race between a reg f20c...Our power band lacks so badly in torque that you never know, this might work out alot better then people think, and i't won't mess with the 50/50 weight distribution due to it being the same weight. I say try it out.
Wow, is that faith?? Thanks man, i think maybe i deserve a little credit anyway huh? The 2JZ s2000 wasnt easy guys, i did that just to see if i could. Start to finish in 31 days. Its not (hacked) in there either, which all you that go to NOPI this year will see. Noboby has been up close to this car, or drivin this car to be able to even say something like that. The only problem this car has is speed limit signs and cops! It performs as good as it looks, and turns heads everywhere it goes. This idea i had is now a reality, and that feels great! Id like to do another similar swap into a s2000. The k series engine has me curious. There are no points to prove here, this is all for fun. Just trying to give you guys something new to look at. Im listening to everything you all are saying, and processing all this before i do another. Meanwhile, thanks for all your feedback, good or bad.
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 12:18 AM
  #120  
2JZs2000Creator50/50racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by versionJDM,Dec 27 2006, 03:47 PM
i vounteer to be the first F20 to smash on the k20 s2k.
Would you like to try to (smash) my s2000?? Hell, well put it on youtube!!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:48 AM.