JDM Tuning Expert advice and discussion on JDM tuning for your S2000.

the Official "NA Tuning" thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #1591  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Sep 10 2006, 06:28 PM
He has magical pixie dust that makes his car have 275 hp!
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #1592  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 10 2006, 04:16 PM
Out of all the N/A peeps on this thread, I think my S is making more power. Not trying to be arrogant or anything, but that is just my gut feeling. versionJDM is making some very impressive power given his mod list, but I am very confident that my S is making more than 227rwhp. My S is certainly making more than 147 ft-lbs torque. Last time I dyno'd my S made 165 ft-lbs, and that was with my previous exhaust (which was crap!).
i dont know how this is an arguement when he puts down more WHP than you on a mustang which reads lower than a dynojet... i believe he is even at higher elevation...... am i missing something???



im not trying to sturr up anything i just wanna know how come you think yours is more powerfull?
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 05:57 PM
  #1593  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

oh, thought it was dynojet for some reason......

what is your quickest trap in the 1/4, have you had a chance yet?
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 05:57 PM
  #1594  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by BlownAP,Sep 10 2006, 06:47 PM
i dont know how this is an arguement when he puts down more WHP than you on a mustang which reads lower than a dynojet... i believe he is even at higher elevation...... am i missing something???



im not trying to sturr up anything i just wanna know how come you think yours is more powerfull?
AP, i dyno at sea level more or less, maybe 200ft above.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:06 PM
  #1595  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

so JDM, what are the next mods to hit the goal?

then gonna go for 240whp right
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #1596  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

[QUOTE=BlownAP,Sep 10 2006, 07:06 PM] so JDM,
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #1597  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by BlownAP,Sep 10 2006, 07:06 PM
so JDM, what are the next mods to hit the goal?

then gonna go for 240whp right
for 240rwhp i will be using my 70mm single and emanage and skunk2/crower cams. you just wait and see.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #1598  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 10 2006, 07:28 PM
I don't think you'll see anymore power with those cams.
word out of crower is that their cams are good for 10-15whp!
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:38 PM
  #1599  
Berlina#2290's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Default

good numbers JDM.
and what type track are you talking about? 1/4?????
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #1600  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by Berlina#2290,Sep 10 2006, 07:38 PM
good numbers JDM.
and what type track are you talking about? 1/4?????
oh ya. i never really auto-x or track it so dragging is my only "track."



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM.