the Official "NA Tuning" thread
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Mar 12 2006, 09:49 AM
versionJDM checking in with the numbers:
i'll post the sheet and vid later, its been a busy weekend. ready?
221rwhp 143.5rwtq.(mustang dyno)
i am very happy and pulled more than i thought i would!!! good luck HvRRz!!!!
i'll post the sheet and vid later, its been a busy weekend. ready?
221rwhp 143.5rwtq.(mustang dyno)
i am very happy and pulled more than i thought i would!!! good luck HvRRz!!!!
Impressive, and you don't have many mods. Who said this motor won't benefit with simple mods.
Now do mustang dyno read lower then most?
can' wait for mine.
thanks for all the nice words guys! i think that a few choosen mods can make all the difference. plus my vafc did have a crappy tune, the tech there, travis, made some adjustments and now the car really does pull till redline.
so i need only 9rwhp to get to my 230 goal. so do you guys think i can hit 230 with a header and TB?
also, i havent seen many NA dyno plots, hows my TQ number? low, average, high?
also, i havent seen many NA dyno plots, hows my TQ number? low, average, high?
I think 9hp is easily achievable with a J's header and a 70mm TB...and hopefully more then that.
As for your torque, I think its average? Looking at my dyno (while it read high...) for general comparison sake, I was 14hp higher but 20ft/lbs higher and my torque was considered very healthy for the motor, more like 2.1L torque. So I think yours would be average for the 2.0L with your mods.
As for your torque, I think its average? Looking at my dyno (while it read high...) for general comparison sake, I was 14hp higher but 20ft/lbs higher and my torque was considered very healthy for the motor, more like 2.1L torque. So I think yours would be average for the 2.0L with your mods.
Originally Posted by Silver9k,Mar 12 2006, 10:13 PM
I think 9hp is easily achievable with a J's header and a 70mm TB...and hopefully more then that.
As for your torque, I think its average? Looking at my dyno (while it read high...) for general comparison sake, I was 14hp higher but 20ft/lbs higher and my torque was considered very healthy for the motor, more like 2.1L torque. So I think yours would be average for the 2.0L with your mods.
As for your torque, I think its average? Looking at my dyno (while it read high...) for general comparison sake, I was 14hp higher but 20ft/lbs higher and my torque was considered very healthy for the motor, more like 2.1L torque. So I think yours would be average for the 2.0L with your mods.



