S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

S2000 STR prep resource

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 10:05 PM
  #2821  
ALFYonso's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, WA
Default

Originally Posted by chetly,Oct 13 2010, 11:39 AM
Just in case anyone was interested, i measured the spring rate of the saner bar last night.

softest setting: 554lbs
medium setting: 667lbs
hard setting: 798lbs
Cool, I was wondering if this info was out there, thanks!

Questions though - do you know how this translates to effective spring rate? Is that lbs/inch of deflection? Sorry if I'm using the wrong jargon here. Is that like adding +554/667/798 lbs/inch of stiffness to whichever corner is being compressed? I'm sure it's not that simple, just trying to imagine how this is quantified...

...I have a Veh-Dyn text book that would be handy for this, but it's trapped in my garage somewhere
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 07:55 AM
  #2822  
dnace's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by nmrado,Oct 13 2010, 10:49 PM
I installed a set of J's Racing S2 camber joints this evening. Here's the camber curve before and after the install -



The dashed line is about where the stock ride height sits, ~14.2" hub center-to-fender lip. The fender lip clearance is improved by installing these joints.

Interestingly, I lost some droop travel by installing them. All of these measurements were taken without the coilovers installed, so the extreme ranges of travel may not be normally possible.

so help me understand this. Are these values the reuglar camber available at that right hight? How does this translate to the camber range available. I was just debating on the S1 or S2 myself. It would be great is I could get a 1.8deg-3.8 range.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 08:01 AM
  #2823  
imstimpy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 570
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by nmrado,Oct 13 2010, 07:49 PM
I installed a set of J's Racing S2 camber joints this evening. Here's the camber curve before and after the install -

The dashed line is about where the stock ride height sits, ~14.2" hub center-to-fender lip. The fender lip clearance is improved by installing these joints.

Interestingly, I lost some droop travel by installing them. All of these measurements were taken without the coilovers installed, so the extreme ranges of travel may not be normally possible.

I saw that and had an "uh-oh" moment but I bought the S1, not the S2.

Doesn't -3.5 sound excessive? I was thinking I wanted to try a very conservative -2.2 first.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #2824  
User 121020's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by dnace,Oct 14 2010, 09:55 AM
so help me understand this. Are these values the reuglar camber available at that right hight? How does this translate to the camber range available. I was just debating on the S1 or S2 myself. It would be great is I could get a 1.8deg-3.8 range.
Correct, these are the maximum negative camber values at different ride heights for the front driver side of my car. The OE camber eccentric is set to yield maximum camber, currently. Make sense?

I'm not sure what the actual range of the eccentric is now, but it's probably something like -3.7 to -1.7 at stock ride height. The next time I'm on an alignment rack, I'll measure the range.

I'm going to dial it back and start around -3.2 in the front. From what I've read, the R-S3s need a lot of camber to get even temperature across the tread width.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 08:56 AM
  #2825  
FormulaRedline's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 3
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally Posted by chetly,Oct 13 2010, 01:39 PM
Just in case anyone was interested, i measured the spring rate of the saner bar last night.

softest setting: 554lbs
medium setting: 667lbs
hard setting: 798lbs
I'm trying to understand how the Saner stiffness translates into roll stiffness (specifically so I can replace it with my stock sway bar and increase the front spring rates for NASA TT points reasons). I'm not sure I understand the units here, how should I interpret these measurements? Thanks in advance for any help!
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 09:58 AM
  #2826  
chetly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Default

From my understanding it takes 667lbs of force to move the bar 1 inch, just like a spring on a shock.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #2827  
macr88's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

But the shocks and bars aren't mounted in the same location are they? If they are then the wheel rate will be the same, if they're not then you'll have to calculate it out. Right?
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #2828  
chetly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Default

yeah, that's not what the wheel rate is, that's strictly the bar rate. Were gonna try and figure out what the wheel rates are when we do roll centers.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #2829  
FormulaRedline's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 3
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally Posted by chetly,Oct 14 2010, 12:58 PM
From my understanding it takes 667lbs of force to move the bar 1 inch, just like a spring on a shock.
Move what 1" inch where? The arms rotate, they don't translate.
[QUOTE=macr88,Oct 14 2010, 01:29 PM]But the shocks and bars aren't mounted in the same location are they? If they are then the wheel rate will be the same, if they're not then you'll have to calculate it out.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #2830  
dan_uk's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA, USA
Default

hey formularredline I don't know the scientific answer but its gonna make less difference than you might think

I would say around add about 100/150lbs spring difference



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 PM.