S2000 STR prep resource
Originally Posted by Orthonormal,Jan 24 2011, 12:28 PM
The '06+ have different gearing than the '04-'05? Tell me more.
I did not think there was a gearing difference between the AP2v1 (04-05) and AP2v2's (06+). I'm just a lowly AP1 owner (10 year old car now), so I could have missed that, but I would be surprised there was a difference.
Originally Posted by daverx7,Jan 24 2011, 08:42 AM
I'm with ya there...
I did not think there was a gearing difference between the AP2v1 (04-05) and AP2v2's (06+). I'm just a lowly AP1 owner (10 year old car now), so I could have missed that, but I would be surprised there was a difference.
I did not think there was a gearing difference between the AP2v1 (04-05) and AP2v2's (06+). I'm just a lowly AP1 owner (10 year old car now), so I could have missed that, but I would be surprised there was a difference.
04-05 can't do that.
Ok, I'm feeling pretty dense here. The proposed 14.10.F allows piggyback ECU controllers? I know nothing about ECUs, what are some examples of piggybacks that would be legal if this is accepted?
What the heck does 'b)' mean? By definition, won't we have to splice into the harness? Can this controller fully bypass the stock ECU?
Does this mean that the early cars have the same unlimited tuning options that the 06+ cars have? If so, cool! I liked the little power bump that I got when lowering VTEC engagement with a VAFC, and that was without any fuel tuning.
a) Connects between the standard ECU and its wiring harness only.
b) Must be plug-compatible with the standard ECU (no splices).
b) Must be plug-compatible with the standard ECU (no splices).
Does this mean that the early cars have the same unlimited tuning options that the 06+ cars have? If so, cool! I liked the little power bump that I got when lowering VTEC engagement with a VAFC, and that was without any fuel tuning.
Originally Posted by captain_pants,Jan 24 2011, 12:10 PM
Ok, I'm feeling pretty dense here. The proposed 14.10.F allows piggyback ECU controllers? I know nothing about ECUs, what are some examples of piggybacks that would be legal if this is accepted?
What the heck does 'b)' mean? By definition, won't we have to splice into the harness? Can this controller fully bypass the stock ECU?
Does this mean that the early cars have the same unlimited tuning options that the 06+ cars have? If so, cool! I liked the little power bump that I got when lowering VTEC engagement with a VAFC, and that was without any fuel tuning.
What the heck does 'b)' mean? By definition, won't we have to splice into the harness? Can this controller fully bypass the stock ECU?
Does this mean that the early cars have the same unlimited tuning options that the 06+ cars have? If so, cool! I liked the little power bump that I got when lowering VTEC engagement with a VAFC, and that was without any fuel tuning.
No soldering or splicing. Only plug and play via a harness.
So, I've been thinking more and more about the idea of eliminating the need for anti-roll bars all together. With reasonable coil rates and tuning of roll-center heights, it seems like it would be completely possible to build a suspension setup that did not need anti-roll bars to control chassis roll. And, it would be nice to drop 30 or 40 lbs from the chassis.
Perhaps I have not done enough research, though. Has anyone tried this approach before? Are their any disadvantages to this approach, e.g. eliminating the dynamic load coupling between both right and left sides, etc?
Just thinkin' out loud...
Perhaps I have not done enough research, though. Has anyone tried this approach before? Are their any disadvantages to this approach, e.g. eliminating the dynamic load coupling between both right and left sides, etc?
Just thinkin' out loud...
Originally Posted by TheNick,Jan 24 2011, 12:13 PM
The intent is that the piggyback can be unplugged in impound and the car still runs and drives.
No soldering or splicing. Only plug and play via a harness.
No soldering or splicing. Only plug and play via a harness.
Originally Posted by nmrado,Jan 24 2011, 12:31 PM
So, I've been thinking more and more about the idea of eliminating the need for anti-roll bars all together. With reasonable coil rates and tuning of roll-center heights, it seems like it would be completely possible to build a suspension setup that did not need anti-roll bars to control chassis roll. And, it would be nice to drop 30 or 40 lbs from the chassis.
Perhaps I have not done enough research, though. Has anyone tried this approach before? Are their any disadvantages to this approach, e.g. eliminating the dynamic load coupling between both right and left sides, etc?
Just thinkin' out loud...
Perhaps I have not done enough research, though. Has anyone tried this approach before? Are their any disadvantages to this approach, e.g. eliminating the dynamic load coupling between both right and left sides, etc?
Just thinkin' out loud...
Originally Posted by Random1,Jan 23 2011, 07:55 PM
Another rear mount option if you feel like doing some fabrication work. Canister mounts to 1/4 aluminum. It uses the subframe mounting bolt just above the rear sway bar to hold it in place. The canister ends up just on the other side of the subframe from what Nick shows. In this position it relatively easy to adjust and check/fill the canister with nitrogen.

This front option keeps the canister out of the engine bay heat and can be adjusted with the wheel in place and car on the ground.


This front option keeps the canister out of the engine bay heat and can be adjusted with the wheel in place and car on the ground.

I've tried no bars and it is awesome but it sucks.
No, really, I liked it for driving on bumpy roads but yes, transitions were horrible. There is little doubt in my mind that to achieve roll resistance like you'd want, the coil rates would be so high that bump compliance would be out of this world and the car wouldn't stay on the ground.
No, really, I liked it for driving on bumpy roads but yes, transitions were horrible. There is little doubt in my mind that to achieve roll resistance like you'd want, the coil rates would be so high that bump compliance would be out of this world and the car wouldn't stay on the ground.
Originally Posted by ///MIKE,Jan 24 2011, 10:50 AM
... gearing is identical.. until 06+ uses Hondata/reflash. Then they have an 8500 rpm redline which changes the top speed in 2nd gear.
04-05 can't do that.
04-05 can't do that.
I ran the Mugen N1 ECU (AP1 ECU) last year, with it's 9000 RRM limiter.


