S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

S2000 STR prep resource

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #4491  
daverx7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by IntegraR0064
Originally Posted by daverx7' timestamp='1313600247' post='20886772
[quote name='IntegraR0064' timestamp='1313597846' post='20886619']
By the way I'm higher ride height than most people so I have no trouble whatsoever getting my current settings which are 0.5 degrees total toe and 2.0 deg camber, with stock everything back there other than obviously the ride height.
Oh yeah... I remember that from Toledo. When are you going to "fix" that? LOL I keed!!!
LOL, I'm making it a combination autocross and rallycross S2000, will that be a problem? More seriously, it's my daily driver and it actually seems to work pretty well although I am starting to wonder if lowering it a bit will solve some of my problems.[/quote]
I'm diggin' a rally s2000. When you run it, let me know. I'll be there to watch it in action.

Honestly, my car is slammed in the back and fairly low up front. I just didn't see that big of a change in ride quality. It won't hurt to try it out for a bit and see if you like it or not. Now my CRX's ride quality on the other hand is horrible in STS trim!!! However, Matt has told me that it is due to the choice of shocks (Koni Yellows).
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 06:48 AM
  #4492  
IntegraR0064's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Default

Originally Posted by daverx7
Honestly, my car is slammed in the back and fairly low up front. I just didn't see that big of a change in ride quality. It won't hurt to try it out for a bit and see if you like it or not. Now my CRX's ride quality on the other hand is horrible in STS trim!!! However, Matt has told me that it is due to the choice of shocks (Koni Yellows).
The ride height doesn't make the ride quality bad, but the higher spring rates necessary to not hit my fenders do, and what I'm actually more concerned with is scraping the bottom of the car on stuff.

I'm trying to go with a little different approach of a little lower spring rates and subsequently a little higher ride height than other people, so that the suspension can actually do something when it hits bumps, I think it's worth a try. My front was actually hitting hard on the inside of the fender well before, enough to mess up my alignment. I had raised it 0.25"-ish from that point right before toledo and I haven't had problems with it since. Not sure if I could fix that with a spacer or something...it was with 17x9 6ULRs +63 offset and 255 hankooks. I probably could lower the rear more though, I'll look into that. I'll measure my current hub to fender distances and post up.
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #4493  
Zeus2k's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Default

I know the ecu rules haven't gone ahead yet but I was just curious if this was on anyone else's radar. Looks like a decent alternative to the haltech s500/s1000 and its cheap too!

http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produc...S2000/AEM/FIC/
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 01:22 PM
  #4494  
bronxbomber252's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 38
Default

That is more of a forced induction thing... it can only retard timing, not advance it like we would want.
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 08:39 AM
  #4495  
daverx7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Default

Tirerack just shipped my new RS3's... just in time for Nationals. Wooot!!
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 10:07 AM
  #4496  
Zeus2k's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Default

speaking of tirerack.. I noticed they are listing a set of enkei rims 17x9 +60 for just over 1000 dollars. They claim to be 17lbs too. Not the best offset sadly but still nice to see options.

and on the AEM F/IC.. thanks for pointing that out I hadn't noticed it was only retarding timing. Still its probably a better option that a VAFC.
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 10:32 AM
  #4497  
KrazyKarl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 15
From: Boulder, CO
Default

Originally Posted by IntegraR0064
Sounds like you've pretty much got the general idea. One thing to keep in mind is front camber adjustment, not sure if you're including that under suspension. My 2006 with just the wheels/tires, sway bar, springs/shocks, and front ball joints, even with my not being that great of a driver, was enough to win a prosolo and enough that I'm leading STR locally this season. So just that is definitely enough to do pretty good at least at a local and divisional level. Flashpro would be the next most important thing and that's what I'm doing next - without it you'll start to hate faster courses and that's never a natural thing, haha.

To get more detailed than that, yeah you should probably just read the thread again, or at least the 2nd half.
Why does flashpro help with the faster courses? Less shifting into 3rd and sitting on the rev limiter? More camber will be nice, right now I'm running BS in the local street tire class and the outside edges of the front R-S3s are wearing faster then the inside.
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #4498  
daverx7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by KrazyKarl
Why does flashpro help with the faster courses? Less shifting into 3rd and sitting on the rev limiter?
I am betting he is referring to the ability to raise the rev-limiter of the 06+ AP2 from 8K to 8.5/8.6K gives them an advantage on the faster courses. But, I am thinking that flashpro helps them even more so with the slower courses that requires digging out of a hole. That was an eye opener when I saw Geoff and his CR at Toledo Day 1 digging out of a hole in 2nd gear and still having gobs of power.... where I had to do the downshift with my AP1. (whew... I got my weekly whine of my whoosie AP1 low end TQ)

-Dave
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 11:14 AM
  #4499  
IntegraR0064's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Default

Originally Posted by daverx7
Originally Posted by KrazyKarl' timestamp='1313778741' post='20894634
Why does flashpro help with the faster courses? Less shifting into 3rd and sitting on the rev limiter?
I am betting he is referring to the ability to raise the rev-limiter of the 06+ AP2 from 8K to 8.5/8.6K gives them an advantage on the faster courses. But, I am thinking that flashpro helps them even more so with the slower courses that requires digging out of a hole. That was an eye opener when I saw Geoff and his CR at Toledo Day 1 digging out of a hole in 2nd gear and still having gobs of power.... where I had to do the downshift with my AP1. (whew... I got my weekly whine of my whoosie AP1 low end TQ)

-Dave
Yep, you got it. I've already got a decent amount more torque than you, when I codrove a (untuned) AP1 at the Dover tour I felt quite torqueless. I do hear the flashpro increases that quite a bit more, but the constantly having to shift to 3rd is more obvious and staring you in the face than some unknown amount of increased torque.
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 11:30 AM
  #4500  
daverx7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by IntegraR0064
Yep, you got it. I've already got a decent amount more torque than you, when I codrove a (untuned) AP1 at the Dover tour I felt quite torqueless. I do hear the flashpro increases that quite a bit more, but the constantly having to shift to 3rd is more obvious and staring you in the face than some unknown amount of increased torque.
My whining finally validated by an AP2 owner? Yes, I can go home for the day. My job is done.


Need I say more?

Sigh...

-Dave



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.