S2000 STR prep resource
Originally Posted by daverx7' timestamp='1313600247' post='20886772
[quote name='IntegraR0064' timestamp='1313597846' post='20886619']
By the way I'm higher ride height than most people so I have no trouble whatsoever getting my current settings which are 0.5 degrees total toe and 2.0 deg camber, with stock everything back there other than obviously the ride height.
By the way I'm higher ride height than most people so I have no trouble whatsoever getting my current settings which are 0.5 degrees total toe and 2.0 deg camber, with stock everything back there other than obviously the ride height.
I'm diggin' a rally s2000. When you run it, let me know. I'll be there to watch it in action.

Honestly, my car is slammed in the back and fairly low up front. I just didn't see that big of a change in ride quality. It won't hurt to try it out for a bit and see if you like it or not. Now my CRX's ride quality on the other hand is horrible in STS trim!!! However, Matt has told me that it is due to the choice of shocks (Koni Yellows).
Honestly, my car is slammed in the back and fairly low up front. I just didn't see that big of a change in ride quality. It won't hurt to try it out for a bit and see if you like it or not. Now my CRX's ride quality on the other hand is horrible in STS trim!!! However, Matt has told me that it is due to the choice of shocks (Koni Yellows).
I'm trying to go with a little different approach of a little lower spring rates and subsequently a little higher ride height than other people, so that the suspension can actually do something when it hits bumps, I think it's worth a try. My front was actually hitting hard on the inside of the fender well before, enough to mess up my alignment. I had raised it 0.25"-ish from that point right before toledo and I haven't had problems with it since. Not sure if I could fix that with a spacer or something...it was with 17x9 6ULRs +63 offset and 255 hankooks. I probably could lower the rear more though, I'll look into that. I'll measure my current hub to fender distances and post up.
I know the ecu rules haven't gone ahead yet but I was just curious if this was on anyone else's radar. Looks like a decent alternative to the haltech s500/s1000 and its cheap too!
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produc...S2000/AEM/FIC/
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produc...S2000/AEM/FIC/
speaking of tirerack.. I noticed they are listing a set of enkei rims 17x9 +60 for just over 1000 dollars. They claim to be 17lbs too. Not the best offset sadly but still nice to see options.
and on the AEM F/IC.. thanks for pointing that out I hadn't noticed it was only retarding timing. Still its probably a better option that a VAFC.
and on the AEM F/IC.. thanks for pointing that out I hadn't noticed it was only retarding timing. Still its probably a better option that a VAFC.
Sounds like you've pretty much got the general idea. One thing to keep in mind is front camber adjustment, not sure if you're including that under suspension. My 2006 with just the wheels/tires, sway bar, springs/shocks, and front ball joints, even with my not being that great of a driver, was enough to win a prosolo and enough that I'm leading STR locally this season. So just that is definitely enough to do pretty good at least at a local and divisional level. Flashpro would be the next most important thing and that's what I'm doing next - without it you'll start to hate faster courses and that's never a natural thing, haha.
To get more detailed than that, yeah you should probably just read the thread again, or at least the 2nd half.
To get more detailed than that, yeah you should probably just read the thread again, or at least the 2nd half.

-Dave
Originally Posted by KrazyKarl' timestamp='1313778741' post='20894634
Why does flashpro help with the faster courses? Less shifting into 3rd and sitting on the rev limiter?

-Dave
Yep, you got it. I've already got a decent amount more torque than you, when I codrove a (untuned) AP1 at the Dover tour I felt quite torqueless. I do hear the flashpro increases that quite a bit more, but the constantly having to shift to 3rd is more obvious and staring you in the face than some unknown amount of increased torque.


Need I say more?
Sigh...
-Dave



