S2000 STR prep resource
I applaud your enthusiasm about this but you could also buy Paul Haney's The High Performance Tire and read about contact patches. It is all for argument anyhow since I seriously doubt any of us could describe exactly how a marginally shallower contact patch will affect the clock.
Understand that the area of a contact patch remains the same when you change tire widths, within reason. If a tire starts with a 8 unit wide, 2 unit deep contact patch, widening the patch by 1 unit up to 9 units will decrease the depth by 0.22 to 1.77 units deep.*
At the end of the day, everybody will compare notes, still ask which one is faster, andstill request that somebody does an A/B of the 245 and 255.
* These numbers are made up, but the same math works on an assumed 245mm wide contact patch that is 10mm deep. Widen the contact patch by exactly 10mm for a 255mm wide tire, and the patch depth will decrease by 0.4mm.
Understand that the area of a contact patch remains the same when you change tire widths, within reason. If a tire starts with a 8 unit wide, 2 unit deep contact patch, widening the patch by 1 unit up to 9 units will decrease the depth by 0.22 to 1.77 units deep.*
At the end of the day, everybody will compare notes, still ask which one is faster, andstill request that somebody does an A/B of the 245 and 255.
* These numbers are made up, but the same math works on an assumed 245mm wide contact patch that is 10mm deep. Widen the contact patch by exactly 10mm for a 255mm wide tire, and the patch depth will decrease by 0.4mm.
Originally Posted by Orthonormal,Feb 24 2011, 11:33 AM
I've never seen a light wheels vs heavy wheels test that showed that large a difference in times -- and I don't remember it being a big difference in weight anyway. Maybe 2 pounds per wheel? Where was that test published, maybe Sports Car?
What were the Miata wheels? Enkei 17x8 RPF-1s and TRM 17x9? If so, that is 4.5lbs per wheel.
The 245 vs 255 test showed up in the Oct 2010 issue of Grassroots. Fresh Dunlops, shaved and scrubbed, on 17x9 wheels on the Tire Rack test course. (smooth, clean, but worn asphalt)
The wheel weight difference between the 17x9's (TRM C3 and Kosei K1-TS) was 3.6 lbs. The wheel and tire difference combined was 5.2 lbs. The 245's turned an average lap time .66 seconds faster on our 53 second test course. Two drivers were used, John (Woody) Rogers and myself, variables were minimized to the best of our ability and both drivers times were averaged. Both drivers saw a very similar drop in lap times with consistent runs on a course we know extremely well. We also retested the first tire run at the end of the test to make certain course or driver condition had not changed.
Past experience has shown us that the small wheel weight difference has a minimal impact on run times on a smooth course. After the article was printed, we received several questions about this, so we went back (after Nationals) and retested the same tires on identical weight wheels to see how much of the time difference may have come from the wheels alone.
Those tests results will be in a future issue of GRM, but I can share that it did not amount to any where close to the original .66 second time difference. In short, the better acceleration due to lower gearing and the increase in driver confidence due to the more precise feel of the 245 won out in this particular test, under these conditions etc.
Great thread - hope to see/meet a bunch of you at the Dixie Tour.
-Chris Harvey
Tire Rack/GRM Project STR - 2010 MX5
The wheel weight difference between the 17x9's (TRM C3 and Kosei K1-TS) was 3.6 lbs. The wheel and tire difference combined was 5.2 lbs. The 245's turned an average lap time .66 seconds faster on our 53 second test course. Two drivers were used, John (Woody) Rogers and myself, variables were minimized to the best of our ability and both drivers times were averaged. Both drivers saw a very similar drop in lap times with consistent runs on a course we know extremely well. We also retested the first tire run at the end of the test to make certain course or driver condition had not changed.
Past experience has shown us that the small wheel weight difference has a minimal impact on run times on a smooth course. After the article was printed, we received several questions about this, so we went back (after Nationals) and retested the same tires on identical weight wheels to see how much of the time difference may have come from the wheels alone.
Those tests results will be in a future issue of GRM, but I can share that it did not amount to any where close to the original .66 second time difference. In short, the better acceleration due to lower gearing and the increase in driver confidence due to the more precise feel of the 245 won out in this particular test, under these conditions etc.
Great thread - hope to see/meet a bunch of you at the Dixie Tour.
-Chris Harvey
Tire Rack/GRM Project STR - 2010 MX5
Thanks man
Edit- test were done on a miata, less weight and not as much power. The results wouldn't be the same on a s2k since we fight to put down power and might need the extra tire to accommodate the extra weight in a steady state corner
Edit- test were done on a miata, less weight and not as much power. The results wouldn't be the same on a s2k since we fight to put down power and might need the extra tire to accommodate the extra weight in a steady state corner
Originally Posted by TRTrent,Feb 24 2011, 02:00 PM
The 245 vs 255 test showed up in the Oct 2010 issue of Grassroots. Fresh Dunlops, shaved and scrubbed, on 17x9 wheels on the Tire Rack test course. (smooth, clean, but worn asphalt)
The wheel weight difference between the 17x9's (TRM C3 and Kosei K1-TS) was 3.6 lbs. The wheel and tire difference combined was 5.2 lbs. The 245's turned an average lap time .66 seconds faster on our 53 second test course. Two drivers were used, John (Woody) Rogers and myself, variables were minimized to the best of our ability and both drivers times were averaged. Both drivers saw a very similar drop in lap times with consistent runs on a course we know extremely well. We also retested the first tire run at the end of the test to make certain course or driver condition had not changed.
Past experience has shown us that the small wheel weight difference has a minimal impact on run times on a smooth course. After the article was printed, we received several questions about this, so we went back (after Nationals) and retested the same tires on identical weight wheels to see how much of the time difference may have come from the wheels alone.
Those tests results will be in a future issue of GRM, but I can share that it did not amount to any where close to the original .66 second time difference. In short, the better acceleration due to lower gearing and the increase in driver confidence due to the more precise feel of the 245 won out in this particular test, under these conditions etc.
Great thread - hope to see/meet a bunch of you at the Dixie Tour.
-Chris Harvey
Tire Rack/GRM Project STR - 2010 MX5
The wheel weight difference between the 17x9's (TRM C3 and Kosei K1-TS) was 3.6 lbs. The wheel and tire difference combined was 5.2 lbs. The 245's turned an average lap time .66 seconds faster on our 53 second test course. Two drivers were used, John (Woody) Rogers and myself, variables were minimized to the best of our ability and both drivers times were averaged. Both drivers saw a very similar drop in lap times with consistent runs on a course we know extremely well. We also retested the first tire run at the end of the test to make certain course or driver condition had not changed.
Past experience has shown us that the small wheel weight difference has a minimal impact on run times on a smooth course. After the article was printed, we received several questions about this, so we went back (after Nationals) and retested the same tires on identical weight wheels to see how much of the time difference may have come from the wheels alone.
Those tests results will be in a future issue of GRM, but I can share that it did not amount to any where close to the original .66 second time difference. In short, the better acceleration due to lower gearing and the increase in driver confidence due to the more precise feel of the 245 won out in this particular test, under these conditions etc.
Great thread - hope to see/meet a bunch of you at the Dixie Tour.
-Chris Harvey
Tire Rack/GRM Project STR - 2010 MX5
When will this issue be out?
"but I can share that it did not amount to any where close to the original .66 second time difference."
So the 245s were faster but not 0.66 seconds like before?
Originally Posted by TRTrent,Feb 24 2011, 04:00 PM
In short, the better acceleration due to lower gearing and the increase in driver confidence due to the more precise feel of the 245 won out in this particular test, under these conditions etc.
As much as I appreciate you guys trying to figure out the contact patch, in the end the only way to tell is to run them back to back on the same car and let the stopwatch decide. If I can get my handson someone else s 255, mebbe well swap and compare times.
James Yom
Originally Posted by IntegraR0064,Feb 23 2011, 10:21 PM
This doesn't make sense to me either. I think Nick is trying to get everyone else to run on smaller tires so he can beat everyone 

I have no dog in this fight anymore, I've learned my lesson - now I'm just trying to recoup my losses (well I will be as soon as I have time to start pulling the car apart).
Originally Posted by TheNick,Feb 25 2011, 07:56 AM
Nope just trying to help.
I have no dog in this fight anymore, I've learned my lesson - now I'm just trying to recoup my losses (well I will be as soon as I have time to start pulling the car apart).
I have no dog in this fight anymore, I've learned my lesson - now I'm just trying to recoup my losses (well I will be as soon as I have time to start pulling the car apart).



