S2000 STR prep resource
Originally Posted by TheNick,Feb 3 2010, 09:52 AM
To me that means that if you run a shorter body shock, you must run an equally long bump stop. You can't add bump travel to the car. If you run a longer shock, you can run a shorter bump stop. That being said - I'm not as familiar with the Stock Class rules as I am with the ST rules (good thing I'm on the STAC and not the SAC right?
)
)The aftermarket shock must be within +- 1 inch of the stock shock while fully extended. The spring perch must be the same distance from the lower mounts as the stock shock is.
The bump stop must contact the shock at the same point in the suspension travel as stock as well so you would need a longer bump stop if you have a shorter shock body.
Where I was able to play with the rules some is in the shock being fully extended on the work bench. I got a clarification that the fully extended is meant while sitting on a work bench NOT on the car. We installed a rebound spring in the shock so that it would remain stock in length when sitting on the work bench but would increase in length just over an inch when bolted to the car. This allowed an extra inch of rebound travel which is huge on an open diff RWD stock class car. The car put the power down quite a bit better once I put those shocks on the car.
Originally Posted by keifla123,Feb 3 2010, 10:12 AM
The bump stop must contact the shock at the same point in the suspension travel as stock as well so you would need a longer bump stop if you have a shorter shock body.
Overall fully extended length has to be within 1", and the overall length at the initial bump stop contact can't be longer than stock. With the consequence that the bump stop cannot engage earlier than stock. There is nothing wrong with delayed bump stop contact due to a shorter shock body or a shorter bump stop, under the Stock rules.
Originally Posted by Rodney,Feb 3 2010, 05:46 AM
we'll see about that skippy...
apparently my head is so big that I can't run anything with a roof.
FM last year, some STR fun and most likely ES Miata at Tours and Nationals this year.
Originally Posted by glagola1,Feb 3 2010, 10:34 AM
FWIW, My tires make contact with the frame in the top of the wheel arch about 2.5"-3" before the shock will bottom out. I don't use bumpstops. If I did, they would have to be about 4"-5" long. This is apparent by observing the dirty portion of the piston rod that's not swept clean by the shock seals.
...
I have as much as I want... or more than I'll ever need. My rear wheels droop giving about 8" between the fender and the tire and the fronts droop about 5". The wheels/tires will make contact with the body/frame before the shocks bottom out.
...
I have as much as I want... or more than I'll ever need. My rear wheels droop giving about 8" between the fender and the tire and the fronts droop about 5". The wheels/tires will make contact with the body/frame before the shocks bottom out.
Someday you're going to find a big enough bump to bottom out any spring rate. My experimentation with a CSP Miata and an AS S2000 shows that bumpstop engagement/stiffness can be used to tune at-the-limit behaviour quite dramatically on bumpy surfaces.
The more I read, the more I realize we autocross on much bumpier lots that most on this forum. I've worn holes in my front fender liners (inside by the upper frame rail and outside where it attaches to the fenders) with 225/50R16 Dunlop Z1 tires on the stock AP1 wheels, Penskes, and a 1.5" Ankenny bar. That's with the bumpstop engagement point being within 0.1" of the stock parts.
Holes worn in the liners are not illegal. They used to be but the rule was changed. I can't remember when but it's been over a year.
Also, the compression damping found on a Moton acts a bit like a bumpstop. Hitting the bump stops when I was on Konis happend MUCH more often. That's one reason I disliked those shocks. They had less compression and I hated the feeling of blowing through the compression stroke and waiting for the rebound to control the car.
If you do a search on my username, the history of my experience with Motons will be laid out. It's pretty funny. The more I know and learn, the more I love those shocks. They really shine on bumpy lots. The first time I installed them on the CRX, I was blown away. The car felt like it was floating on a cushion of air. None of the track irregularities bothered the car at all. Anyway....
The tires rarely make contact with the frame. I am used to rubbing the fenderlirners as I did in STS so a little rubbin never hurt anything. It's a gauge to how low the car should be. No rubbin means drop it some. A little rubbin means you're as low as can be and a lot of rubbin means raise it.
Also, the compression damping found on a Moton acts a bit like a bumpstop. Hitting the bump stops when I was on Konis happend MUCH more often. That's one reason I disliked those shocks. They had less compression and I hated the feeling of blowing through the compression stroke and waiting for the rebound to control the car.
If you do a search on my username, the history of my experience with Motons will be laid out. It's pretty funny. The more I know and learn, the more I love those shocks. They really shine on bumpy lots. The first time I installed them on the CRX, I was blown away. The car felt like it was floating on a cushion of air. None of the track irregularities bothered the car at all. Anyway....
The tires rarely make contact with the frame. I am used to rubbing the fenderlirners as I did in STS so a little rubbin never hurt anything. It's a gauge to how low the car should be. No rubbin means drop it some. A little rubbin means you're as low as can be and a lot of rubbin means raise it.
Originally Posted by Orthonormal,Feb 3 2010, 02:24 PM
Overall fully extended length has to be within 1", and the overall length at the initial bump stop contact can't be longer than stock. With the consequence that the bump stop cannot engage earlier than stock. There is nothing wrong with delayed bump stop contact due to a shorter shock body or a shorter bump stop, under the Stock rules.
14.5 SHOCK ABSORBERS
A. Shock absorber bump stops may be altered or removed.
B. Any shock absorbers may be used. Shock absorber mounting
brackets which serve no other purpose may be altered, added, or
replaced, provided that the attachment points on the body/
frame/subframe/chassis/suspension member are not altered. This
installation may incorporate an alternate upper spring perch/seat
and/or mounting block (bearing mount).




