S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

S2000 STR prep resource

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 09:11 AM
  #4541  
mLeach's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Default

Does anyone know what make of exhaust was on Geoff Walker's car?
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 09:15 AM
  #4542  
pinkertonpunk's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Pewaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by mLeach
Does anyone know what make of exhaust was on Geoff Walker's car?
I am almost positive it is a 60mm J's racing exhaust. I don't know which one though.
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 09:31 AM
  #4543  
IntegraR0064's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Default

Originally Posted by 762
Discussion and the like would still be visible here. If anything the sheet works as a quick reference to people's setups. For example if Josh discusses a handling problem, I can now, instead of digging through several 100+ pages to find his most recent setup I can easily pull up the document and look at it before making a comment here.

I do not want to move discussion from this forum, and the googledoc does not really allow that anyway. Instead the spreadsheet is simply an easy reference.

Also if people would prefer, I can put the link up either here or somewhere else and open up the security so that anyone can view it.
I think it's a good idea to have people at least have to submit a setup in order to view the spreadsheet - it'll motivate people to do so. It doesn't necessarily have to be a good setup. And if they're just starting out, they can say that and get access but it's sort of expected that they update it once they get something good going.

I think another important thing would be to have, as part of submitting a setup, a field for how well sorted they think it is (Maybe "Great", "Almost there", and "Not good" or something similar) for quick filtering of which setups work and which don't. And finally, having people maybe describe in a sentence or something what they feel strengths and weaknesses are. Something like "very fast setup but can get loose in slaloms" or "Easy to drive but understeer in tight sweepers", "Good all around but destroys fender liner clips", etc.

Obviously all the discussion will still take place here, so I don't think that's an issue either.


Originally Posted by pinkertonpunk
Here is my setup at Nationals:
Thanks Colin, it is really interesting seeing the wide variation in setups.

Couple questions for anyone who can answer:
1) Has everyone that posted a setup from nationals had the stock differential? Robert Thorne has the Giken right, and did Annie Bauer end up keeping her Giken working long enough to make it through nationals or no?
2) Do Moton Clubsports have a standard valving? Is there somewhere I can find a dyno plot of it?
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 09:40 AM
  #4544  
pinkertonpunk's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Pewaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by IntegraR0064
Originally Posted by 762' timestamp='1315327655' post='20947444
Discussion and the like would still be visible here. If anything the sheet works as a quick reference to people's setups. For example if Josh discusses a handling problem, I can now, instead of digging through several 100+ pages to find his most recent setup I can easily pull up the document and look at it before making a comment here.

I do not want to move discussion from this forum, and the googledoc does not really allow that anyway. Instead the spreadsheet is simply an easy reference.

Also if people would prefer, I can put the link up either here or somewhere else and open up the security so that anyone can view it.
I think it's a good idea to have people at least have to submit a setup in order to view the spreadsheet - it'll motivate people to do so. It doesn't necessarily have to be a good setup. And if they're just starting out, they can say that and get access but it's sort of expected that they update it once they get something good going.

I think another important thing would be to have, as part of submitting a setup, a field for how well sorted they think it is (Maybe "Great", "Almost there", and "Not good" or something similar) for quick filtering of which setups work and which don't. And finally, having people maybe describe in a sentence or something what they feel strengths and weaknesses are. Something like "very fast setup but can get loose in slaloms" or "Easy to drive but understeer in tight sweepers", "Good all around but destroys fender liner clips", etc.

Obviously all the discussion will still take place here, so I don't think that's an issue either.


Originally Posted by pinkertonpunk
Here is my setup at Nationals:
Thanks Colin, it is really interesting seeing the wide variation in setups.

Couple questions for anyone who can answer:
1) Has everyone that posted a setup from nationals had the stock differential? Robert Thorne has the Giken right, and did Annie Bauer end up keeping her Giken working long enough to make it through nationals or no?
2) Do Moton Clubsports have a standard valving? Is there somewhere I can find a dyno plot of it?
Thorne and I had an OS Giken that hasn't had any issues yet. Annie was running the stock Torsen since her new Giken blew up again before the pro on practice starts. Not sure who else had a Giken. I updated my post to add the OS Giken.
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 10:39 AM
  #4545  
josh7owens's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,340
Likes: 0
From: Frankfort, KY
Default

I think the spead sheet would be good, I've added my set-up to it and hope alot of others do to. Once we have a FAQ for STR it would be a great resource for everyone, especially begainers. I agree that there should be somthing asking how figured out it the car is and if it's good for one type of course verus another. Maybe even a driver style question.

If we don't have something like this we are going to have people asking for set-up advice for years to come, with access to this the people can get on there and see what works and make a decision on a set-up to start with basied on driving style and type of course they normally run.

For example a couple weeks ago I asked matt about his set-up, we went back and forth for 10 post or so (almost a whole page), with a resource like this I can just click on the spread sheet and say "hey heres matts newest set-up and this is what he has to say about it."


If we can get all the top STR guys to do this along with slow asses like me people could really benfit from it. Another example, I was debating buying spc ball joints for the rear to get less camber a few weeks ago but according to everyones nationals set-up I really just need more toe in.

I think it would be great for everyone.
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 01:28 PM
  #4546  
IntegraR0064's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Default

I added a spot for differential, and the rate your setup from 1-5 box to the template. So anyone that already filled it out maybe add that stuff. I'll get my info added later today.
Old Sep 6, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #4547  
fsmtnbiker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Melchior's AP1 has a stock diff (for now)

Setup related:

Throughout the season we have found that increasing roll stiffness has made the car not handle/feel as good for either driver. When we went to a solid 1.25" element and the stock AP1 MY00 bar, the car was very well balanced, but neither end of the car was ever "planted" (subjective). It felt like you could overdrive the front or the rear very easily. When we went down in roll stiffness and up in spring rate to keep the total roll rate close, the car got more driveable, and more driveable on varying surfaces. Total grip seemed to go up as well, but I don't have any data to back this up.

On our local asphalt lots, the Hankooks are faster than the Dunlops. Every time. As I mentioned in the Nats thread, even when shaved, they do seem to need a scrubbing or heat cycle to really come in. The set that Mark and Nick drove on at Nats have 150+ runs and were started full tread. I would shave them to 5 or 6/32 just to get rid of the "crown" that is molded into the tires (they start with approx 10/32" in the center and 5-6/32" on the shoulders.)

Interesting to hear that the Dunlops were faster on the practice course. That Lincoln concrete always has a trick up its sleeve. I think we will be doing more at Lincoln next season pre-Nats to try to get more seat time and tuning done at low elevation and on the Nats surface. It really is a trip gaining 20-25% more torque and HP (or as the people who went to the Vail tour 2 years ago know, losing 30%+)
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 06:42 AM
  #4548  
rjones's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
Default

Has anybody tried the Toyo R1R on the S2000? Looking at Nationals results the Toyo owns ST and STS but very few people in other classes run them.

For the people that have tried them what did you think? I am thinking about using them for rain and cooler events, but not sure if I should just stick with the Dunlop star specs.
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 07:30 AM
  #4549  
762's Avatar
762
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

It has been my understanding that they do not work as well on the heavier cars like ours compared to the featherweight ST/STS cars. However, supposedly they are great at the pro's for launches, but I have no personal experience with them.
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 07:36 AM
  #4550  
glagola1's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by fsmtnbiker
Melchior's AP1 has a stock diff (for now)

Setup related:

Throughout the season we have found that increasing roll stiffness has made the car not handle/feel as good for either driver. When we went to a solid 1.25" element and the stock AP1 MY00 bar, the car was very well balanced, but neither end of the car was ever "planted" (subjective). It felt like you could overdrive the front or the rear very easily. When we went down in roll stiffness and up in spring rate to keep the total roll rate close, the car got more driveable, and more driveable on varying surfaces. Total grip seemed to go up as well, but I don't have any data to back this up.
See, it's interesting that I have the opposite observation and I have been running Dunlops exclusively. Perhaps the Kooks don't enjoy the fast loading of a big bar set up? It's annoying comparing set ups now that I've developed the car on Dunlops due to the Kook shortage. I just can't imagining having to soften the roll rates to accomodate a tire that is sloppier than what I'm running currently. Right now, my car is predictable and easy to drive. ugh...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:08 PM.