S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

S2000 STR prep resource

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 07:36 AM
  #3031  
Orthonormal's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 1
From: Azusa
Default

Originally Posted by josh7owens,Dec 9 2010, 04:49 PM
it’s a common theory in the "drag racing" world. I understand that they inferior to you because you go around cones and they only go in a straight lines(...)
I'm sorry if you were offended by my little poke (but not that sorry) -- but I've gotten tired of re-posting my derivation of the actual number every time someone repeats some folklore based number like 4 or 10 or 20. Just as IntegraR0064 stated, if you work out the physics then for acceleration and braking, the absolute maximum multiplier is 2x for weight on the tread of the tire, and about 1.5x for weight at the rim of the wheel -- although I disagree that there's no multiplier in braking; the force may be limited by the friction of the tire, but that force still has to go towards slowing down the rotation of the wheel. I suppose if you lock up all four wheels, the multiplier goes to 1...but you won't stop as fast for other reasons.

I kid because I hope it will make people more likely to evaluate their sources and maybe do a little of their own research to confirm claims before treating them as true.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 08:02 AM
  #3032  
IntegraR0064's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Default

[QUOTE=Orthonormal,Dec 10 2010, 08:36 AM] although I disagree that there's no multiplier in braking; the force may be limited by the friction of the tire, but that force still has to go towards slowing down the rotation of the wheel.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #3033  
spaded.racer's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 420
Likes: 50
From: 'burbs of Chicago
Default

Just saying Hi and throwing in my .02...

I bought an AP1 a few weeks backs that I am prepping for STR. I finished reading all 120 pages a few days after picking up the car

I have been racing an IS300 in STX for the past few years that has been a hoot to drive. Driver and car wise it finally became competitive locally last year but I decided to move onto something lighter and with more power so I chose to try out an S2000 in STR.


On to questions/comments.

The IS300 was/is fairly tail happy car on course so I feel alot I learned on that car can be applied to the S. Has anyone had any issues(or comments) running extremely staggered spring rates F/R like 750/500 or 850/500? I had to do a similar setup on my IS along with a weak rear bar, which required me to still turn down the dampening almost all the way down on the Koni's I had installed.


As for wheel weights, on my IS between stock/all-seasons and kosei/dunlops the weight difference was 6-7lbs each wheel and it was noticeable difference. Acceleration and braking were much easier with the race wheels/tires on(duh!), the car felt lighter/livelier. I plan on running TRmotorsports wheels on the S which I know are not the lightest but money is an issue.
I am not worried at all about some guy running wheels that are even 5-6 pounds lighter than mine, it's too small of a factor to really play into the big picture of things. Driver differences will be the bigger issue. Maybe in a few years when an S2000 setup gets ironed out lightweight wheels will be higher up on the list of needs to reach a "full prepped for the class" car. I just think the time and money would be better spent elsewhere.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 08:47 AM
  #3034  
PedalFaster's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by josh7owens,Dec 10 2010, 06:53 AM
Some people feel the need to be-little someone on the internet when they have an opportunity.
What you view as belittling, I view as correcting misinformation before it gets out of hand, which I think is important on a forum dedicated to exchanging information such as this one.

Take your own situation as an example. Someone online declared that wheel weight savings are ten times more effective than weight savings elsewhere. They weren't called on it, so when you read their post, you believed it. Now you've sold your perfectly good wheels and are stressing over spending lots of money on a specific set of wheels that will provide minimal to no discernable improvement over the 949s. If only someone had challenged the original post before you read it, you'd be both richer and calmer today.

In your case, you happen to post a healthy number of interesting claims. Off of the top of my head, from the past few months:
  • Reducing wheel weight by a pound has the same effect as reducing unsprung weight by eight to ten pounds
  • Update / backdate is ok in Street Touring as long as you're changing to heavier parts
  • Rear toe-out in an S2000 is a good idea
  • Your favorite intake requires some cutting to install, so the SCCA should allow cutting to install intakes, because no one will take advantage of that allowance in an unforeseen way
When you post interesting claims, then you should expect to be challenged on them. That's not belittling -- that's just (I'm admittedly stretching the term here) peer review in an attempt to keep the quality of the information exchange here high.

Edit: Reworded to sound less belittling.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #3035  
chetly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Dec 10 2010, 09:47 AM
What you view as belittling, I view as correcting misinformation before it gets out of hand, which I think is important on a forum dedicated to exchanging information such as this one.

Take your own situation as an example. Someone online declared that wheel weight savings are ten times more effective than weight savings elsewhere. They weren't called on it, so when you read their post, you believed it. Now you've sold your perfectly good wheels and are stressing over spending lots of money on a specific set of wheels that will provide minimal to no discernable improvement over the 949s. If only someone had challenged the original post before you read it, you'd be both richer and calmer today.

In your case, you happen to post a healthy number of interesting claims. Off of the top of my head, from the past few months:
  • Reducing wheel weight by a pound has the same effect as reducing unsprung weight by eight to ten pounds
  • Update / backdate is ok in Street Touring as long as you're changing to heavier parts
  • Rear toe-out in an S2000 is a good idea
  • Your favorite intake requires some cutting to install, so the SCCA should allow cutting to install intakes, because no one will take advantage of that allowance in an unforeseen way
When you post interesting claims, then you should expect to be challenged on them. That's not belittling -- that's just (I'm admittedly stretching the term here) peer review in an attempt to keep the quality of the information exchange here high.

Edit: Reworded to sound less belittling.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 01:51 PM
  #3036  
daverx7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Default

[QUOTE=PedalFaster,Dec 10 2010, 01:47 PM]In your case, you happen to post a healthy number of interesting claims.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #3037  
macr88's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

^ stock bump stops?
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #3038  
TheNick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by daverx7,Dec 10 2010, 05:51 PM
For the local events, I like my AP1 with a tiny bit of toe out... but my setup is not the typical setup plus our local venues are tighter than sh!t.

For the bigger events, the verdict is still out. I have this stance as my car is still in more development than I want. I started a few months late last year and were still making big changes between day 1 and day 2 at Nats. The good news is that at Blytheville the car was rockin! You know the typical excuse... my co-driver coned all 3 runs on day 1, but was still able to pull in 4th place even with that additional 2 seconds. (yeah... I know I still suck, but the car did feel really good.) I must admit that it took a big ass spin on his 3rd run, but he is not sure if it was due to the toe out in the rear or if we have a bump stop thing goin' on.... hence, the verdict is still out.

-Dave
From what Andy told me - the toe out on your car is really hindering its capabilities.

He was like: "Dave's co-driver is really really good, how he can possibly drive that car fast is beyond me. Put a better setup on it and he'll be kicking everyone's ass."
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 07:15 AM
  #3039  
daverx7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by TheNick,Dec 11 2010, 11:27 AM
From what Andy told me - the toe out on your car is really hindering its capabilities.

He was like: "Dave's co-driver is really really good, how he can possibly drive that car fast is beyond me. Put a better setup on it and he'll be kicking everyone's ass."
Yeah, at first we agreed about the toe out and dial it back a smidge (likely to 0), but later on my co-driver, Mark, did throw in the other possibility that we might have the rear a tiny bit too low causing us to hit the bump stops (that came with the the used set of TC Kline DA's). So we are not disagreeing with Andy's assessment just that there might be another thing to look at as well. Good news is that both changes are easy and cheap.

Mark is a very good driver and with my car finally getting down to minor tweaking here and there (and going on a diet... lots of pork on this car), he will be up there with you top guys. Also, factors in my personal life is going to allow me to go any f'ing event I want. With that being said, I hope to get more seat time at the bigger venues... (vs. only 3 times or so) before Nats. Unless the car breaks, 2011 is going to be interesting.

-Dave
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 10:23 AM
  #3040  
imstimpy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 570
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by josh7owens,Dec 9 2010, 09:24 AM
I agree that "I'm not screwed" but I want any advantage I can have. Some would think paying double for wheels just to save a couple pounds is crazy but others will save up and try to find a set. (such as myself) On a tight course I don't think it would make a difference but on a course like blythville I think it would of made a difference.

If we didn't care about weight we would all be rocking tirerack wheels.
There is a ~2lb difference between Hankooks (lighter) and Dunlops (heavier). 1st at Blytheville was on Hankooks, 2nd was on Dunlops, 3rd was on Hankooks. As is said somewhere, it is within driver noise. If robots were driving, shaving 2lbs per corner might show up. Since we are all human, well, an extra 15 minutes of sleep might prove more useful.

Personally, I like the Buddy Club wheels. I chose to go heavier and get two sets of 6ULRs so I could try different tires. Do what makes you happy, first and foremost.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51 PM.