S2000 STR prep resource
Originally Posted by josh7owens,Dec 9 2010, 04:49 PM
it’s a common theory in the "drag racing" world. I understand that they inferior to you because you go around cones and they only go in a straight lines(...)
I kid because I hope it will make people more likely to evaluate their sources and maybe do a little of their own research to confirm claims before treating them as true.
[QUOTE=Orthonormal,Dec 10 2010, 08:36 AM] although I disagree that there's no multiplier in braking; the force may be limited by the friction of the tire, but that force still has to go towards slowing down the rotation of the wheel.
Just saying Hi and throwing in my .02...
I bought an AP1 a few weeks backs that I am prepping for STR. I finished reading all 120 pages a few days after picking up the car
I have been racing an IS300 in STX for the past few years that has been a hoot to drive. Driver and car wise it finally became competitive locally last year but I decided to move onto something lighter and with more power so I chose to try out an S2000 in STR.
On to questions/comments.
The IS300 was/is fairly tail happy car on course so I feel alot I learned on that car can be applied to the S. Has anyone had any issues(or comments) running extremely staggered spring rates F/R like 750/500 or 850/500? I had to do a similar setup on my IS along with a weak rear bar, which required me to still turn down the dampening almost all the way down on the Koni's I had installed.
As for wheel weights, on my IS between stock/all-seasons and kosei/dunlops the weight difference was 6-7lbs each wheel and it was noticeable difference. Acceleration and braking were much easier with the race wheels/tires on(duh!), the car felt lighter/livelier. I plan on running TRmotorsports wheels on the S which I know are not the lightest but money is an issue.
I am not worried at all about some guy running wheels that are even 5-6 pounds lighter than mine, it's too small of a factor to really play into the big picture of things. Driver differences will be the bigger issue. Maybe in a few years when an S2000 setup gets ironed out lightweight wheels will be higher up on the list of needs to reach a "full prepped for the class" car. I just think the time and money would be better spent elsewhere.
I bought an AP1 a few weeks backs that I am prepping for STR. I finished reading all 120 pages a few days after picking up the car

I have been racing an IS300 in STX for the past few years that has been a hoot to drive. Driver and car wise it finally became competitive locally last year but I decided to move onto something lighter and with more power so I chose to try out an S2000 in STR.
On to questions/comments.
The IS300 was/is fairly tail happy car on course so I feel alot I learned on that car can be applied to the S. Has anyone had any issues(or comments) running extremely staggered spring rates F/R like 750/500 or 850/500? I had to do a similar setup on my IS along with a weak rear bar, which required me to still turn down the dampening almost all the way down on the Koni's I had installed.
As for wheel weights, on my IS between stock/all-seasons and kosei/dunlops the weight difference was 6-7lbs each wheel and it was noticeable difference. Acceleration and braking were much easier with the race wheels/tires on(duh!), the car felt lighter/livelier. I plan on running TRmotorsports wheels on the S which I know are not the lightest but money is an issue.
I am not worried at all about some guy running wheels that are even 5-6 pounds lighter than mine, it's too small of a factor to really play into the big picture of things. Driver differences will be the bigger issue. Maybe in a few years when an S2000 setup gets ironed out lightweight wheels will be higher up on the list of needs to reach a "full prepped for the class" car. I just think the time and money would be better spent elsewhere.
Originally Posted by josh7owens,Dec 10 2010, 06:53 AM
Some people feel the need to be-little someone on the internet when they have an opportunity.
Take your own situation as an example. Someone online declared that wheel weight savings are ten times more effective than weight savings elsewhere. They weren't called on it, so when you read their post, you believed it. Now you've sold your perfectly good wheels and are stressing over spending lots of money on a specific set of wheels that will provide minimal to no discernable improvement over the 949s. If only someone had challenged the original post before you read it, you'd be both richer and calmer today.

In your case, you happen to post a healthy number of interesting claims. Off of the top of my head, from the past few months:
- Reducing wheel weight by a pound has the same effect as reducing unsprung weight by eight to ten pounds
- Update / backdate is ok in Street Touring as long as you're changing to heavier parts
- Rear toe-out in an S2000 is a good idea
- Your favorite intake requires some cutting to install, so the SCCA should allow cutting to install intakes, because no one will take advantage of that allowance in an unforeseen way
Edit: Reworded to sound less belittling.
Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Dec 10 2010, 09:47 AM
What you view as belittling, I view as correcting misinformation before it gets out of hand, which I think is important on a forum dedicated to exchanging information such as this one.
Take your own situation as an example. Someone online declared that wheel weight savings are ten times more effective than weight savings elsewhere. They weren't called on it, so when you read their post, you believed it. Now you've sold your perfectly good wheels and are stressing over spending lots of money on a specific set of wheels that will provide minimal to no discernable improvement over the 949s. If only someone had challenged the original post before you read it, you'd be both richer and calmer today.
In your case, you happen to post a healthy number of interesting claims. Off of the top of my head, from the past few months:
Edit: Reworded to sound less belittling.
Take your own situation as an example. Someone online declared that wheel weight savings are ten times more effective than weight savings elsewhere. They weren't called on it, so when you read their post, you believed it. Now you've sold your perfectly good wheels and are stressing over spending lots of money on a specific set of wheels that will provide minimal to no discernable improvement over the 949s. If only someone had challenged the original post before you read it, you'd be both richer and calmer today.

In your case, you happen to post a healthy number of interesting claims. Off of the top of my head, from the past few months:
- Reducing wheel weight by a pound has the same effect as reducing unsprung weight by eight to ten pounds
- Update / backdate is ok in Street Touring as long as you're changing to heavier parts
- Rear toe-out in an S2000 is a good idea
- Your favorite intake requires some cutting to install, so the SCCA should allow cutting to install intakes, because no one will take advantage of that allowance in an unforeseen way
Edit: Reworded to sound less belittling.

Originally Posted by daverx7,Dec 10 2010, 05:51 PM
For the local events, I like my AP1 with a tiny bit of toe out... but my setup is not the typical setup plus our local venues are tighter than sh!t. 
For the bigger events, the verdict is still out. I have this stance as my car is still in more development than I want. I started a few months late last year and were still making big changes between day 1 and day 2 at Nats. The good news is that at Blytheville the car was rockin! You know the typical excuse... my co-driver coned all 3 runs on day 1, but was still able to pull in 4th place even with that additional 2 seconds. (yeah... I know I still suck, but the car did feel really good.) I must admit that it took a big ass spin on his 3rd run, but he is not sure if it was due to the toe out in the rear or if we have a bump stop thing goin' on.... hence, the verdict is still out.
-Dave

For the bigger events, the verdict is still out. I have this stance as my car is still in more development than I want. I started a few months late last year and were still making big changes between day 1 and day 2 at Nats. The good news is that at Blytheville the car was rockin! You know the typical excuse... my co-driver coned all 3 runs on day 1, but was still able to pull in 4th place even with that additional 2 seconds. (yeah... I know I still suck, but the car did feel really good.) I must admit that it took a big ass spin on his 3rd run, but he is not sure if it was due to the toe out in the rear or if we have a bump stop thing goin' on.... hence, the verdict is still out.
-Dave
He was like: "Dave's co-driver is really really good, how he can possibly drive that car fast is beyond me. Put a better setup on it and he'll be kicking everyone's ass."
Originally Posted by TheNick,Dec 11 2010, 11:27 AM
From what Andy told me - the toe out on your car is really hindering its capabilities.
He was like: "Dave's co-driver is really really good, how he can possibly drive that car fast is beyond me. Put a better setup on it and he'll be kicking everyone's ass."
He was like: "Dave's co-driver is really really good, how he can possibly drive that car fast is beyond me. Put a better setup on it and he'll be kicking everyone's ass."
Mark is a very good driver and with my car finally getting down to minor tweaking here and there (and going on a diet... lots of pork on this car), he will be up there with you top guys. Also, factors in my personal life is going to allow me to go any f'ing event I want. With that being said, I hope to get more seat time at the bigger venues... (vs. only 3 times or so) before Nats. Unless the car breaks, 2011 is going to be interesting.

-Dave
Originally Posted by josh7owens,Dec 9 2010, 09:24 AM
I agree that "I'm not screwed" but I want any advantage I can have. Some would think paying double for wheels just to save a couple pounds is crazy but others will save up and try to find a set. (such as myself) On a tight course I don't think it would make a difference but on a course like blythville I think it would of made a difference.
If we didn't care about weight we would all be rocking tirerack wheels.
If we didn't care about weight we would all be rocking tirerack wheels.
Personally, I like the Buddy Club wheels. I chose to go heavier and get two sets of 6ULRs so I could try different tires. Do what makes you happy, first and foremost.




