S2000 STR prep resource
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Originally Posted by mLeach,Sep 13 2010, 05:45 PM
Did you guys even look at the results? Cassino was driving a Marc P's CR. Wayne VanVoorhees was co-driving with Reyenga.
I guess they fixed that.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by daverx7,Sep 13 2010, 05:48 PM
Hmm... I thought he was driving J's White CR. Crazy how well the stock CR did in STR. Good car and good driver.
-Dave
-Dave
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Pewaukee, WI
Originally Posted by keifla123,Sep 13 2010, 09:00 PM
Mike was driving Jadrice's B stock CR on 17x8.5 SSR Type F wheels with 255 Hankooks. Wayne was driving Reyenga's AP1.
-Colin
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Sparta NJ
Originally Posted by mLeach,Sep 13 2010, 09:45 PM
Did you guys even look at the results? Cassino was driving a Marc P's CR. Wayne VanVoorhees was co-driving with Reyenga.
http://sololive.scca.com/STR.html
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by alvanderp,Sep 13 2010, 03:36 PM
With the way 4.8.A. is written currently I don't see how it could happen. The best you could hope for is a proposal for changing 4.8.A for the 2012 rules and that change allowing the SEB to make STR National then. Given that it looks like the ST re-org is likely to be a 2012 thing, I suspect that's what will happen.
Making STR National now would be in direct contravention of the current rule, and sets a horrible precedent for following the rulebook and the process for changing it, no matter how awesome the participation has been.
Making STR National now would be in direct contravention of the current rule, and sets a horrible precedent for following the rulebook and the process for changing it, no matter how awesome the participation has been.
Drew is right - the SEB does not have the power to make this decision.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Orthonormal,Sep 13 2010, 04:44 PM
There is a rumored upcoming re-organization of ST, to include all Stock-eligible cars, and provide enough classes for them all to feel at home.
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 570
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by macr88,Sep 13 2010, 12:56 PM
Do you think this could be because of the anti squat?
It seems better when the rear is lower than the front but it still gets loose on corner entry if off throttle. It's very annoying and I originally thought it was a rebound issue but don't think it's possible with the amount of rebound I'm running now.
It seems better when the rear is lower than the front but it still gets loose on corner entry if off throttle. It's very annoying and I originally thought it was a rebound issue but don't think it's possible with the amount of rebound I'm running now.
Former Moderator
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Originally Posted by imstimpy,Sep 14 2010, 09:13 AM
It has been my experience that lowering the rear in relation to the front decreases front weight transfer on lift and increases rear weight transfer on accel. It should stabilize corner entry and stabilize throttle application.
Is it a torsen issue or does this come from suspension geometry like anti squat?