S2000 STR prep resource
Originally Posted by ///MIKE,Sep 22 2010, 04:39 PM
I completely agree. An s2000 (AP2) has considerably more power than an MX5. However, if I remember correctly, ole Motonishi destroyed all the s2000’s 60/ft times at the Pro finale. Can’t look right now because it seems like the results server is down… that’s just what I recall anyway.
Originally Posted by sirbunz,Sep 22 2010, 11:00 AM
From watching these cars all season battle it out at the tours and Pros, this is simply not true.
The MX-5 has better power delivery without upsetting the stability/traction as much as the S2000. Acceleration clearly favors the S2000. Overall grip favors the MX-5.
For STR, the S2000 is going to take more time to develop and tame, just like it did in AS/BS. This is one reason I like the AP1 to start with. It has less power, tq, broader powerband and slightly less weight. Im confident there will be a computer fix. Given the current available tires, the AP1 shouldn't overpower the tires as much as the AP2. For me, the proper balance is everything. I would rather have less power with grip than more power without it.
Edit ... as for a computer fix, maybe its time for everyone to send letters to the most likely ECU tuners. With enough demand, someone will figure it out.
-Marc
The MX-5 has better power delivery without upsetting the stability/traction as much as the S2000. Acceleration clearly favors the S2000. Overall grip favors the MX-5.
For STR, the S2000 is going to take more time to develop and tame, just like it did in AS/BS. This is one reason I like the AP1 to start with. It has less power, tq, broader powerband and slightly less weight. Im confident there will be a computer fix. Given the current available tires, the AP1 shouldn't overpower the tires as much as the AP2. For me, the proper balance is everything. I would rather have less power with grip than more power without it.
Edit ... as for a computer fix, maybe its time for everyone to send letters to the most likely ECU tuners. With enough demand, someone will figure it out.
-Marc
i was fortunate enough to drive both eric simmons' 06 miata and dave corsaro's (njdrive's) cr after driving my ap1 this past weekend. eric's car is very well prepped and dave's car is simpler than i thought. there's a lot of time left on the table with no flash and could use more dialing in handling-wise. my ap1 has a front bar, front camber, and motons.
dave's cr was a bit surprising. it felt like it accelerated slower than my ap1 but i'm guessing feeling quick and being quick are two different things. it definitely had dramatic power oversteer tendencies when you get back on the throttle (and this car doesn't have flashpro!). this car is very stable in transitions. i swore i was going to be significantly slower as i crossed the line. i managed to beat his best by .5 seconds and ran my fastest time in this car (meanwhile, i lost a lot of time when i got the cr sideways under power). this must've lit a fire under him- he subsequently ran faster than all of us on his last run.
eric's miata was easy to drive fast. ohlins + os giken = awesome. putting down the power was undramatic unlike the cr. tons of lateral grip. it did exactly what you told it to do. extremely stable and predictable. i was .3 off eric's best having never driven a miata before. i'd describe it like jreyega did about his ap1. almost boring but quick.
eric ran his best time in the one run he took in my ap1 (faster than my own time in it). he loved it and wants to drive it again this weekend. we couldn't get dave to drive mine.. i would like to see what he thinks of it compared to the cr.
after driving all 3 of our cars back to back.. the way they are setup now, they're very close in performance. the ap1 is the most enjoyable to drive for me.. but i feel it doesn't have the potential of the cr. if i could justify double the cost of my '01, i would pick a cr hands down. i'd set it up with the big ankeny bar/flashpro and do whatever else it takes to put the power down early.
dan
Originally Posted by Random1,Sep 22 2010, 11:43 AM
"Rob" please.
Yes it was worth it. Part of the trick is to down shift while braking with rev matching and not slowing too much. That way you only take the hit on the up shift.
Down shifts to first were done for the first and second turn arounds, the left at the top right, and the turn around at the top left (end of back end section).
2010 Nationals West Course - 62.379 sec
On the east course I struggled in general to put all the parts together. I needed many more runs to perfect that course. There I down shifted into the turn prior to the slalom which headed back, the "pivot" in the top right, and after the wiggle prior to the long turn into the finish.
Yes it was worth it. Part of the trick is to down shift while braking with rev matching and not slowing too much. That way you only take the hit on the up shift.
Down shifts to first were done for the first and second turn arounds, the left at the top right, and the turn around at the top left (end of back end section).
2010 Nationals West Course - 62.379 sec
On the east course I struggled in general to put all the parts together. I needed many more runs to perfect that course. There I down shifted into the turn prior to the slalom which headed back, the "pivot" in the top right, and after the wiggle prior to the long turn into the finish.
I can see how downshifting may be more prevalent in STR, specifically because of the street tires. With the lower cornering speeds (when all of the grip in the car is demanded, like in the nationals sweeper/turnarounds) I can see how 1st gear would be necessary, as it clearly is, though there were a couple of downshifts you made that I wouldn't have, it seems to be definitely required to go quick in an AP1 STR car.
Maybe I'll come play in STR in a few years with an AP1. Need to run a CR in BS first though.

Nick
Originally Posted by ghostshadow,Sep 22 2010, 01:52 PM
dave's cr was a bit surprising. it felt like it accelerated slower than my ap1 but i'm guessing feeling quick and being quick are two different things. it definitely had dramatic power oversteer tendencies when you get back on the throttle (and this car doesn't have flashpro!). this car is very stable in transitions. i swore i was going to be significantly slower as i crossed the line. i managed to beat his best by .5 seconds and ran my fastest time in this car (meanwhile, i lost a lot of time when i got the cr sideways under power). this must've lit a fire under him- he subsequently ran faster than all of us on his last run.
I've been test driving cars (stock ones), and I also noticed that the ap2 acceleration feels much slower than AP1. I don't know why. Also my shifts felt super slow in the ap2 - i think there's some computer nonsense slowing down the shifts. Anyone else felt this?
I hope to be able to drive them both in autocross trim to see how they compare that way. This weekend I'm co-driving brian singer's AP1 at warminster - maybe I'll meet you there if you're going.
Originally Posted by IntegraR0064,Sep 22 2010, 02:44 PM
Wow awesome post!
I've been test driving cars (stock ones), and I also noticed that the ap2 acceleration feels much slower than AP1. I don't know why. Also my shifts felt super slow in the ap2 - i think there's some computer nonsense slowing down the shifts. Anyone else felt this?
I hope to be able to drive them both in autocross trim to see how they compare that way. This weekend I'm co-driving brian singer's AP1 at warminster - maybe I'll meet you there if you're going.
I've been test driving cars (stock ones), and I also noticed that the ap2 acceleration feels much slower than AP1. I don't know why. Also my shifts felt super slow in the ap2 - i think there's some computer nonsense slowing down the shifts. Anyone else felt this?
I hope to be able to drive them both in autocross trim to see how they compare that way. This weekend I'm co-driving brian singer's AP1 at warminster - maybe I'll meet you there if you're going.
Power wise ive got all the bolt-on's just need a VAFC
Originally Posted by IntegraR0064,Sep 22 2010, 06:44 PM
Also my shifts felt super slow in the ap2 - i think there's some computer nonsense slowing down the shifts. Anyone else felt this?
Originally Posted by IntegraR0064,Sep 22 2010, 02:44 PM
This weekend I'm co-driving brian singer's AP1 at warminster - maybe I'll meet you there if you're going.
dan
Originally Posted by IntegraR0064,Sep 22 2010, 02:44 PM
I've been test driving cars (stock ones), and I also noticed that the ap2 acceleration feels much slower than AP1.
The AP2 accelerates significantly better, especially in the lower speed ranges...even my butt dyno said so!

I just find it funny. Driving the AP2 feels like driving a big block AP1 to me...
stock for stock.
I'm more interested in tuned for tuned, but have no experience with it so I have to make do with what I've tried.
I've driven a couple AP2s....they honestly feel about the same as my ITR in terms of acceleration - but they should be significantly faster. I only drove one AP1 though, and it really put me back in my seat (or felt like it did). Driving more AP1s to make sure that's really how I felt will be useful here.
I'm more interested in tuned for tuned, but have no experience with it so I have to make do with what I've tried.
I've driven a couple AP2s....they honestly feel about the same as my ITR in terms of acceleration - but they should be significantly faster. I only drove one AP1 though, and it really put me back in my seat (or felt like it did). Driving more AP1s to make sure that's really how I felt will be useful here.




